Wednesday, June 13, 2012

@barackobama Earth to the President: Voters and Donors You Need Are Checking Out of the Process #p2 #tcot


Disillusioned voters are checking out on Obama

Wake the F up, people. Do you really want Romney as President?! Obama won North Carolina by a sliver in 2008 (with a kick-@ss ground game and record turnout). And now Mittens for the first time holds a lead here.

"The presidential race in NC continues to be very close," Public Policy Polling Director Tom Jensen says. "This month we find Mitt Romney leading Obama 48-46. It's a small lead but it's still significant because it's the first we've found Romney leading Barrack Obama in our monthly polling since October.

Romney's gained seven points on Obama over the past two months alone. Jensen says Romney's small lead is probably heavily influenced by independent voters. "Romney's up to 20 percent of the democratic vote after being at 15 percent a few months ago," he says. "For a republican to win in North Carolina really requires winning over a lot of conservative democrats and that 20 percent of the democratic vote suggests Romney's doing a little bit better on that front."

Americans have such a short attention span; yeah, this President didn't give us all of the hopey-changey goodness he promised on the campaign trail, and I've been highly critical of his foot-dragging leadership on several fronts (yes, people, read my back catalog), but really — do people want Romney and his adviser Robert Bork packing the U.S. Supreme Court?

Considering the economic mess/slow recovery, the President has finally decided to cry uncle and declare the obvious — he needs more time, and the Romney alternative would be worse.

rest at http://pamshouseblend.firedoglake.com/2012/06/13/earth-to-the-president-voters-and-donors-you-need-are-checking-out-of-the-process/

US Government Study: Humans are Security Threat to Oceans and our Planet #p2 #tcot

A new study published in Nature Climate Change, asserts that the warming of the world's oceans have everything to do with the effects of man. This scientific research has climate change alarmists excited over a new way to direct man-made climate change into the social meme.

According to the study, "We have identified a human-induced fingerprint in observed estimates of upper-ocean warming on multidecadal timescales."

Computer model data from research from Australia, Japan, India and the US proves that the temperature of the oceans and its variable fluctuations are not a natural occurrence. Causational information fabricated by suppositional computer models from the world's major oceans compared to climate alarmist's computer models shows that there is an excess of man-made influence.

The international team of researchers used for this study attributed only archrival computer models and assumed simulations and compared them to the supposed effects of fossil fuel emissions during the last century.

The report states that "When the global mean changes are included" the "anthropogenic fingerprint" is of 1% which is an insignificant level. Yet, this statistic is being blown out of proportion to create frenzy over the earth's victimization at the hands of humans.

Sheldon Adelson is giving $10 million to Mitt Romney super PAC #p2 #tcot

Casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, who helped prop up House speaker Newt Gingrich's primary campaign for months, is now using his millions to help former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney.

According to two sources familiar with the donation, Adelson is giving $10 million to the pro-Romney super PAC Restore Our Future.

Romney is already catching up with President Obama in fundraising; this donation is yet another boost.


DOJ Reportedly Investigating Cable Companies For Squashing Online Competition #p2 #tcot


The Justice Department is reportedly engaged in an anti-trust investigation into many areas where the cable TV industry might be acting inappropriately to try and quell competition from online video. Many consumers want to pick and choose what they watch, using services like Hulu and Netflix, whereas cable companies would like them to continue to pay for bundles of TV channels, even some they might not watch.

According to sources cited by the Wall Street Journal, the Justice Department has already spoken to online video peddlers and has questioned Comcast, Time Warner Cable and other cable companies.

They're trying to figure out if cable providers have been setting data caps to limit the amount of data a subscriber can download each month in an attempt to keep consumers from viewing content that is outside of the cable companies' offerings.

Since many cable companies provide the high-speed Internet access needed for many consumers to stream video, some pay-TV companies are not too happy about their TV channels being bypassed for online video because of all the cash they've already invested in their current networks.

The TV industry has been tightly regulated for decades, and decisions that are made now could have a huge impact on how video services spread in the future. The probes are examining data caps that Comcast and AT&T use to deal with the uptick in video traffic on the Internet. Cable companies say those limits are necessary to keep the heaviest users from overwhelming the networks.

rest at http://consumerist.com/2012/06/justice-department-investigating-cable-companies-for-improperly-squashing-online-competition.html

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Harvard Grad Student: Racial Search Terms Correlate With Obama Opposition #p2 #tcot

"It's pathetic that there's such a direct correlation between racism and Obama's chances, but it doesn't surprise me. The people I know who really hate Obama are the same people I've had to berate for sending me racist email jokes for years. Yet even some of those people voted for Obama with a rationale that was something along the lines of, "the Republicans have screwed up so bad that I have to vote for the black guy." The president is going to have to figure out some way to peel away some of these voters again, or he'll lose:

Barack Obama won 52.9 percent of the popular vote in 2008 and 365 electoral votes, 95 more than he needed. Many naturally concluded that prejudice was not a major factor against a black presidential candidate in modern America. My research, a comparison of Americans' Google searches and their voting patterns, found otherwise. If my results are correct, racial animus cost Mr. Obama many more votes than we may have realized.

Quantifying the effects of racial prejudice on voting is notoriously problematic. Few people admit bias in surveys. So I used a new tool, Google Insights, which tells researchers how often words are searched in different parts of the United States.

Can we really quantify racial prejudice in different parts of the country based solely on how often certain words are used on Google? Not perfectly, but remarkably well.Google, aggregating information from billions of searches, has an uncanny ability to reveal meaningful social patterns. "God" is Googled more often in the Bible Belt, "Lakers" in Los Angeles.

The conditions under which people use Google — online, most likely alone, not participating in an official survey — are ideal for capturing what they are really thinking and feeling. You may have typed things into Google that you would hesitate to admit in polite company. I certainly have. The majority of Americans have as well: we Google the word "porn" more often than the word "weather.""


Sec. Clinton delivers message for LGBT pride month #p2 #tcot

"In honor of Pride month, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has recorded a video message about the ways in which the United States is working to ensure the rights of LGBT people both here at home and in the nation's policies abroad. The former First Lady and U.S. Senator (D-NY) celebrated the tremendous progress that LGBTs have made around the globe in recent years, but also conceded that the world has a long way to go.

"In the United States and around the world," Clinton said, "progress is being made. The tireless advocacy of generations is bending the arc of history. Barriers are being torn down, discriminatory laws repealed, and millions are now able to live more freely and participate in the future of their communities and countries. But there is still much more to be done. Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender men and women continue to be persecuted and attacked. They are arrested, beaten, terrorized, and even executed."

She discussed projects mounted by U.S. embassies to stage rights marches, hold rallies, sponsor film festivals and other outreach efforts in the name of educating people and raising awareness."



Illinois, Cook County Leads Nation In Wrongful Convictions

Illinois, spurred on by Cook County, leads the nation in wrongful convictions according to a recent report by theThe National Registry of Exonerations is a joint project of the University of the Michigan Law School and theCenter on Wrongful Convictions at Northwestern University School of Law.

Since 1989, 101 people in Illinois have had their convictions overturned. 78 of those cases came from Cook County. That's nine percent of the 891 wrongful convictions listed in the report. The most recent wrongful conviction in Illinois was James Kluppelberg, who had his conviction for a 1984 arson overturned because evidence used in the trial was discredited and a witness who testified Kluppelberg confessed to the crime admitted he lied. Other cases listed in the report link back to the torture practices of former Chicago Police Lt.Jon Burge.

rest at http://chicagoist.com/2012/06/12/illinois_cook_county_leads_nation_i.php

@speakerboehner Boehner Aide Received Bonus From Medical Device Lobby Group Before Overseeing Tax Repeal of Industry #p2 #tcot @gop

from  http://truth-out.org/news/item/9667-boehner-aide-received-$100000-bonus-from-medical-device-lobby-group-before-overseeing-repeal-of-tax-on-med-device-industry

Yesterday, the House of Representatives moved to help save $30 million dollars for medical device companies while defunding programs designed to expand health coverage for ordinary Americans. The House took action on legislation to "repeal a 2.3 percent excise tax on gross sales receipts in excess of $5 million for manufacturers and importers of certain medical devices, including defibrillators, pacemakers and prosthetic limbs." The tax, originally part of the Affordable Care Act, was set up to pay for an expansion in health programs to cover the uninsured in America, which studies have linked to over45,000 deaths a year.

The repeal comes as medical device makers, a $140 billion industry, have lobbied aggressively and showered lawmakers with contributions. A report from the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities notes that the tax would likely spur innovation by promoting cost-effective ways of delivering care, while also ensuring vital health programs are properly funded. Nevertheless, the House passed the bill242-173.

The medical device lobby had several advantages in this fight. For one thing, they had a man in the inside. In late 2010, as Congressman John Boehner (R-OH) prepared to take the gavel as Speaker, he hired a lobbyist named Brett Loper as his new policy chief. Loper left his job at the Advanced Medical Technology Association, a lobby group for medical device-makers, to join Boehner.

Republic Report reviewed ethics forms disclosed filed with the House clerk's office, and noticed that Loper actually received a $100,147 bonus in 2011 for leaving his medical device lobbying group and becoming a public servant. View the disclosure here.

The reverse-revolving door phenomenon has grown in recent years, with lobbyists taking powerful roles within government, putting them in a position to affect outcomes on issues they addressed in their lobbying jobs. As Republic Report exclusively reported, Senator Marco Rubio's (R-FL) chief of staff is a lobbyist who continues to receive payments from his old lobbying firm, despite the fact that he now oversees policy for Rubio's office. Senator Tim Johnson (D-SD), who will be overseeing the investigation of J.P. Morgan's trading loss, hired staff director, Dwight Fettig, a former J.P. Morgan lobbyist, back in 2011 as well.

While much attention has been paid to the number of lawmakers and staff who sell out and become lobbyists, there's equally problematic dynamic when lobbyists burrow into government, provide key giveaways to industry or special interests, then return to K Street with even higher salaries.

Update: A story from Politico in 2010 notes that Loper, as a medical device lobbyist, was "deeply involved" in fighting the medical device tax that was ultimately repealed yesterday.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license.

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Citizens United Unleashed in Wisconsin Recall #p2 #tcot

Recent campaign filings show Governor Scott Walker raising over $30 million to defend himself against recall versus $3.9 million raised by his challenger Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett. Barrett is being outspent 12:1, but even these numbers do not account for the full amount of spending in the race. Since the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Citizens United case, an array of outside groups are playing a major role in elections and Wisconsin is no exception.

Wisconsin's historic recall battle may be seen as a test of grassroots gumption (30,000 volunteers collected close to one million recall signatures) against big outside money in a post-Citizen's United world. With less than a week before the election, spending numbers regarding these outside interest groups are changing by the hour. The nonpartisan Wisconsin Democracy Campaign (WDC) is working hard to track the money and illuminate exactly how high the spending outside of the candidates will go. Right now, WDC pegs total spending in the race at $62 million, including at least $21.4 million in disclosed spending by outside groups in addition to an estimated $7.5 million in undisclosed spending on so-called "issue ads" designed to influence the election.

Here is a brief look at the five biggest outside interest groups spending in Wisconsin's 2012 recall.

Republican Governors Association Claims "Just the Facts"

The Republican Governors Association (RGA)'s Political Action Committee "Right Direction Wisconsin" (RGA-RDW) has been the biggest outside spender in this year's recall election. WDC reports that the group has spent $8.6 million since January 2012 with almost all of their spending going towards TV ads. RGA-RDW considers these ads to be "issue ads" and so does not file any disclosure about the donors whose funds make the ad buys possible. The RGA also operates a "527" group, which does disclose its donors to the IRS, and this may eventually provide some insight into the money behind RGA's messages.

In late March, RGA-RDW ran three ads, one attacking Barrett, one attacking his main primary challengerKathleen Falk, and one attacking both Barrett and Falk for their records as Milwaukee Mayor and Dane County Executive, respectively. Two weeks before the primary, the group sponsored another ad against Barrett, and after the May 8 primary, it ran three ads (here, here, and here) criticizing Barrett and praising Walker. One of RGA-RDW's most widely circulated ads, embedded above, claims to be all about the facts, but it omits key facts, such as the fact that unemployment rose 34 percent under Scott Walker during his term as Milwaukee County Executive, and it omits information about Wisconsin being ranked 50th out of 50 states in the nation on jobs.

Koch money is the RGA's top source for contributions in the 2012 election cycle, with the corporation's co-owner David Koch donating at least $2 million and the company itself giving $25,000. In 2010, the RGA spent $3.4 million to help get Walker elected, with $1 million in help from David Koch and another $50,000 from Koch Industries for RGA to spend among the gubernatorial candidates it was backing, including Walker. In addition, Koch Industries PAC was one of the largest contributors to Walker's campaign for office in 2010.

In contrast, the Democratic Governors Association is not directly running ads in Wisconsin, but is reportedly funding the Greater Wisconsin Committee, spending $1 million.


Walker Wins Recall, Democrats Win Control of the Senate Halting Right-Wing Agenda #p2 #tcot

After a 16-month long fight, an astonishing $63.5 million spent, and a people's uprising that attracted international attention and laid the groundwork for a movement that will last for years to come, Governor Scott Walker will keep his seat after Tuesday's recall election, winning 53-46 over challenger Tom Barrett. Lt. Governor Rebecca Kleefisch also survived her recall challenge.

In the early hours of the morning, word came from Southeastern Wisconsin that former state Sen. John Lehman, D-Racine, beat incumbent Republican Sen. Van Wanggaard, with 36,255 votes to Wanggaard's 35,476 votes, according to unofficial results with all precincts reporting. Combined with two other successful Senate recalls in August of 2011, this win means Democrats flipped the Senate from Republican control and put a halt to the Walker agenda.

A Historic Struggle Over Tremendous Odds

Walker was voted into office in 2010 with a promise to create 250,000 jobs in his first term -- which was appealing to a residents of a state suffering from an economic downturn caused by Wall Street gambling. During the campaign, Walker indicated that he would ask public sector unions to pay more into their health care and pensions, but never suggested that he would attack their right to collectively bargain, which public workers in Wisconsin have had for fifty years.

Walker first announced his plans to roll back collective bargaining rights on February 11, 2011 and anticipated the fight would be over in less than a week. Walker announced his "Budget Repair Bill" (Act 10) on a Friday and planned a vote the following Wednesday, leaving almost no time for public debate or deliberation. He even scheduled a bill signing at the end of the week.

Things did not go according to plan. Students, firefighters, and many others occupied the capitol for 18 days. Hundreds of thousands of people marched on the Capitol after 14 Senate Democrats delayed the vote by exiting the state. When the vote was eventually lost in March of 2011, many protesters vowed to recall Walker.

The task was not a small one. Wisconsin's recall law, which had never been used in a statewide election since its creation in 1926, first required that protesters wait a year before initiating a recall. Next, it required that advocates gather signatures equivalent to 25 percent of ballots cast in the last election -- one of the highest recall thresholds in the nation, much greater than the 12 percent required in California. Volunteers were tasked with gathering 540,000 signatures in 60 days a very high hurdle. But starting in November 2011, 30,000 volunteers braved a cold Wisconsin winter to greatly exceed that number, collecting over 930,000 signatures and triggering the recall election.

At that point, another problem with the recall process quickly emerged. A campaign finance loophole allowed a politician facing recall to accept unlimited campaign donations. This allowed Walker to accept checks for $100,000, $250,000, and $500,000 -- for a total of $30.5 million -- while his opponents engaged in a Democratic primary had to abide by a $10,000 contribution cap. No opponent could overcome this astonishing financial advantage. Finally, because of the Democratic primary on May 8, there was only four weeks for the  winner to raise money, cut ads and campaign around the state. 

Democrats Unable to Match Avalanche of Outside Money

Around $63.5 million was spent in the election. $45 million of that $63.5 million -- more than 70 percent -- came from Walker's campaign and supporters. Because of the loophole in Wisconsin campaign finance law, Walker out-raised Barrett 7.5 to 1 ($30.5 million to $4 million at last count). Two-thirds of Walker's money came from out-of-state, versus only one-fourth of Barrett's money coming from outside Wisconsin.

According to Mike McCabe of the nonpartisan Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, which tracks money in politics, "Money doesn't talk, it screams. And that is what we saw in this election." 


LinkedIn Breach Reportedly Results In Millions Of Passwords Leaked Online

1. Go to linkedin.com.
2. Click on your name in the top right corner and select Settings.
3. Click Change next to Password.
4. Enter your current password and create a new one.

CNN On Solyndra Loan: Bush Started It, There’s No Evidence of Wrongdoing, And Romney’s Attacks Are Made Up #p2 #tcot @MittRomney


CNN has two dynamite pieces on Solyndra, "Romney wrong on Solyndra facts" and "Seven things you should know about Solyndra."

The first one, by Steve Hargreaves of CNN Money, ends:

It's one thing to spin something to one's advantage. It's another to simply make things up to make the other guy look bad. Romney's Solyndra speech was an example of the latter. Disgraceful.

Hargreaves shows that Mitt Romney's key claim — "An independent inspector general looked at this investment and concluded that the Administration had steered money to friends and family and campaign contributors" — has no basis in fact.

The second piece, also by Hargreaves, lists 7 key facts:

1.  It was started by Bush: The DOE loan program that funded Solyndra was actually started by President Bush in 2005. It was intended to provide government support for "innovative technologies"….

In fact, as Climate Progress reported back in September, the "Bush Administration advanced the Solyndra loan guarantee for two years" before Obama became President.

2.  Congress thought there would be more failures: Two companies have declared bankruptcy under the loan program so far, out of the 33 projects funded. Congress was expecting more….

Congress appropriated money to cover expected losses, and multiple independent reviews have confirmed that the actual losses will likely be less than Congress expected.

rest at http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/06/06/495791/cnn-solyndra-loan-bush-started-no-evidence-of-wrong-doing-romney-attacks-are-made-up/

Tuesday, June 5, 2012

The Geography of Economic Hardship in Chicago

here  http://www.chicagomag.com/Chicago-Magazine/The-312/May-2012/The-Geography-of-Economic-Hardship-in-Chicago/

Miami reporter: Hispanics and independents targeted by Florida’s voter purge #p2 #tcot @gop

"In an interview with MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell today, Miami Herald reporter Marc Caputo offered more details as to who is being targeted in Florida Governor Rick Scott's attempt to purge "non-citizens" from the state's voter rolls.

Out of about 2,600 people identified by the Scott administration as non-citizens, Caputo said, 1,600 of them reside in Miami-Dade County. And 58 percent of them were Hispanic voters and voters who registered as independents.

State election commissioners already stopped following Scott's orders to trim the voter rosters, citing "just too many variables" to continue the process."


Head Of Romney Transition Team Issued Hundreds of ‘Job-Killing’ EPA Regulations #p2 #tcot @MittRomney

from http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/06/05/495262/romney-would-be-transition-head-epa-regulations/

Mike Leavitt and Mitt Romney (credit: Jeffrey D. Allred, Deseret News)

Mike Leavitt and Mitt Romney (credit: Jeffrey D. Allred, Deseret News)

Mike Leavitt, the man Mitt Romney has tapped to head his transition should he win this November, has held a wide array of public-sector jobs including Governor of Utah and Secretary of Health and Human Services. But perhaps most interesting is the fifteen months he spent from November 6, 2003 through January 26, 2005 as President George W. Bush's EPA administrator — a period over which he supported many of the environmental protection efforts Romney has railed against through the campaign.

Romney's official campaign website has a prominent section on government regulations entitled "Obama's Failure," which blasts the EPA for "endless new regulations touching on countless other forms of economic activity—regulations that drive up costs, hinder investment, and destroy jobs. Romney has added that "there are other people who would like to put in place a cap-and-trade program and dramatically increase the cost of energy. That's their view. And by the way, that would kill a lot of jobs."

Leavitt has a rather opposite record. In his introductory address to his EPA employees, enthusiastically endorsed a cap-and-trade, telling them:

We need to take the giant step toward national market-based solutions; to do that we need only look to our own experience. That is exactly what we're doing with cap and trade. The cap and trade strategy was key to the breakthrough against acid rain. It is central to Clear Skies. The cap and trade approach shows us again and again that people do more and they do it faster when they have an incentive to do what's in the public's interest.

And, a ThinkProgress analysis of Regulations.gov data reveals that between Leavitt's first day as administrator to his last, the agency promulgated or amended 232 regulatory rules. These
included tougher standards for ozone, diesel fuels, and other air pollutants. Among these were things likeNational Ambient Air Quality Standards for Particulate Matter, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Asbestos, and Protection of Stratospheric Ozone; Refrigerant Recycling; Substitute Refrigerants— the sorts of regulations Romney says "drive up costs, hinder investment, and destroy jobs."

Given their opposite views on these issues and Leavitt's strong support of ObamaCare, he seems a surprising choice to lead Romney's transition.