Friday, September 7, 2012

.@mittromney Laughable, desperate and stupid: Women for Mitt: Obama is the one waging a ‘war on women’ #p2 #tcot

For Gina Maddox, a self-described "sassy Southern woman," this presidential race is all about injustice to women.

And for that reason, she says she'll be voting for Mitt Romney

It is, in many ways, a reversal of the one of the major narratives that has defined this campaign.President Obama and his allies have suggested Republicans are waging a "war on women" through their policies on abortion and health care. But Ms. Maddox rejects that idea.

Liberal women and the left try to measure women's issues by their own yardstick "without asking the Republican women about their concerns," she says. Women's issues, she adds, are far larger than just social issues – and that's the message that she and other women who support Romney are taking to the streets, to Facebook, and to the phones to try to persuade other women to join them. 

In a nutshell: It's the economy, ladies. 

It is a smart move, experts say, though doubt remains about whether the tactic will be enough to overcome many women voters' traditional discomfort with the GOP's social policies. "Many people in the Republican Party are pretty extreme when it comes to pro-life or contraception, and a lot of women are uncomfortable with that," says Debbie Walsh, director of the Center for American Women and Politics atRutgers University in New Brunswick, N.J.

Maddox would seem to have a big hill to climb. Since the 1980, the women's vote in presidential elections has gone to the Democratic candidate every time. Polls for Election 2012 show women favor Mr. Obama over Mr. Romney by at least 7 percentage points.

"Women are more likely to vote for Democratic candidates because they feel that they need a social security net provided by the government, because women are economically more vulnerable," says Professor Walsh.

Some polls have shown a positive blip for Romney after the Republican convention and the speech by his wife, Ann. But the Romney campaign needs Maddox and other women like her.

She started "Women For Romney" this year, and it has about 1,500 members. She also has a Facebook page, an online talk-radio show, and does volunteer work, encouraging women to take county chairs for the Romney campaign. 

"We encourage women to vote for Mitt Romney because what impacts us the most is the economy, government overspending, unemployment, and dismal job creation," says Maddox, who got engaged in the campaign when she was asked to serve as a women's coalition chair for Romney in Florida. "We focus on educating women voters, one vote at a time, woman to woman." 

Asked about social issues, she puts them aside, simply calling Obama's health-care law a disaster.

Rae Lynn Chornenky, president of the National Federation of Republican Women (NFRW), is not so dismissive of social issues, but she agrees that they should not be the focus of efforts to reach out to female voters. An NFRW survey of more than 8,500 Republican women suggests that the economy is first on women's minds going into the 2012 election, she says.

"There is a war on women, and it's coming from the Obama White House and the Democrats," says Ms. Chornenky, quoting government statistics that 92 percent of jobs lost during the Obama administration have been women's jobs – a number Romney likes to cite, as well.

(Fact checkers note that, historically, men lose their jobs first in a downturn, then women. If job statistics from 2007 are included, the male-female jobs-lost ratio changes significantly, and the Annenberg Public Policy Center's nonpartisan Factcheck.org writes: "The unemployment rate is now 8.3 percent for men, 8.1 percent for women.")

But the NFRW's 75,000 members are taking their message to other women through traditional grass-roots campaigning. "We know how to get the message out, whether it's phone calling or going door to door," says Chornenky.

The Romney campaign is also trying to connect with women voters on a personal level. In August, it launched "Women for Mitt," chaired by Mrs. Romney. The group plans town-hall meetings and rallies throughout the country. "Our goal is to get a diverse coalition of women actively involved in the campaign," says Courtney Johnson of the Romney campaign.


The Christian Science Monitor (http://s.tt/1mLiR) 

.@BettinaInclan @mittromney Video: Disgruntled Obama Supporter Actually Republican Staffer Bettina Inclan #p2 #tcot @barackobama

In an attempt to sway undecided voters to vote for Romney, the Republican National Committee has released an ad featuring a woman "breaking up" with Obama and listing reasons why it isn't working out. 

The woman is supposed to be a "frustrated former Obama supporter," according to Talking Points Memo. However, the woman is actually an RNC staffer. 

Bettina Inclan is the Director of Hispanic Outreach for the Republican National Committee. The ad suggests she voted for Obama in 2008 when she's quoted saying, "you're just not the person I thought you were." Yet Inclan worked in Republican politics before the 2008 elections. 

--------------------------

Check out our photo gallery from DNC 2012

--------------------------

In the ad, Inclan says to a cardboard cutout of Obama that "it's not me, it's you. I think we should just be friends." She lists out-of-control spending and Obama's tendency to hang out with celebrities as reasons for the break up. 

The ad ends by asking viewers to share why they want to break up with Obama. 

The RNC says the ad is not dishonest or misleading. 

"It's a lighthearted ad to show how millions of Americans feel about President Obama - he's not the person we thought he was and it's time to break up with him," an official said. "But let's be clear, it's an ad." 

Inclan accepted her current position in the RNC in January 2012, but also did Hispanic outreach for Rick Scott's 2010 Florida race, worked on Capitol hill for Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Rep. Thaddeus McCotter, and as a national director of the Republican National Hispanic Assembly. 

She explained that her Republican outlook came naturally in life.

"I was never pressured to be a Republican, but I am very much a fiscal conservative," she said. "It might be because we were alwas on a very tight budget growing up. Or maybe my views of the world fall in line with the Republican party."

Capturing the attention of undecided or independent voters has become a large strategy in the Republican campaign. Americans for Prosperity has created several ads featuring independents who voted for Obama in 2008, but will not vote for him in 2012.


Thursday, September 6, 2012

‘It’s Arithmetic’: The Best Of Bill Clinton’s DNC Speech, In One Infographic #p2 #tcot choke on this @gop bitches

from  http://thinkprogress.org/election/2012/09/06/808521/its-arithmetic-the-best-of-bill-clintons-dnc-speech-in-one-infographic/ 

Last night, President Bill Clinton formally nominated President Obama for a second term at the Time Warner Center in downtown Charlotte, North Carolina in a fiery, energetic speech that had the DNC crowd roaring from the moment he stepped on stage.

For nearly 50 minutes, Clinton reminded voters of the challenges Obama inherited in 2009, and highlighted the ways in which the administration and Democrats in congress helped put the economy on a path towards recovery. To drive home the point, Clinton employed a running tally of both the Obama White House's and the Republican party's record on private sector jobs over the last 50 years:

wells fargo Destroy’s Couple’s Home Due To Mistaken Foreclosure Filing

Wells Fargo, one of the biggest banks in the U.S., has been at the epicenter of Wall Street malfeasance over the last several years, with its fingerprints all over the housing crisis and the subsequent foreclosure fraud scandal. As Naked Capitalism's Yves Smith put it, Wells Fargo "has an annoying habit of piously claiming it is better than other servicers when it engages in the same indefensible conduct as its peers."

Earlier this year, a judge blasted the bank's foreclosure process, saying, that it "prefers to rely on the ignorance of borrowers or their inability to fund a challenge to its demands, rather than voluntarily relinquish gains obtained through improper accounting methods." Now, the bank has left a family's vacation home in ruins, after a contractor it hired broke in and stole the family's belongings due to a mistaken foreclosure filing:

A local couple's dreams have been shattered by a foreclosure mistake that left their retirement home in ruins.

When banks take over foreclosed homes, they often try to salvage the contents inside to recoup their losses. But what if they have no right to those contents in the first place? Alvin Tjosaas says that scenario is all too real for him. [...]

The house recently had valuables stored in the garage, including decades worth of family heirlooms. But the house was in ruins after Tjosaas says subcontractors hired by Wells Fargo entered the property with a foreclosure notice in hand. The notice had the name Stephen A. Janosik on it, but the address for the Tjosaas family home…Tjosaas says the subcontractors broke down doors, smashed windows, tore down walls, taking anything of value to sell later on.


Wednesday, September 5, 2012

pussy: @foxnews Juan Williams heckled at DNC

Juan Williams told Fox News' Bill O'Reilly that he has been catching some flak at the 2012 Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Williams, who is in Charlotte covering the conventions for Fox News, appeared on O'Reilly's show Tuesday night. O'Reilly asked Williams if convention-goers were grabbing him for pictures and mobbing him. Williams was quick to say that he only received that reception at the Republican National Convention in Tampa.

"I gotta tell you, what's interesting here is, it's very clear that I work with you and Fox News," Williams said.

"Uh oh," O'Reilly responded. "Are you stigmatized?"

"I am," Williams said. "That's alright. I dont mind it. It's who I work for. I'm a proud employee...to me, you guys bail me out."

O'Reilly pressed Williams on how convention attendees were treating him. "Are you getting some jazz down there?..On the street, the people give you a hard time?"

Williams said that people ask him why he works for Fox News and how he puts up with working at the network. Williams said, "You know what, when I'm talking on Fox...nobody's telling me what to say. I have honest conversations, honest debate and we go back and forth. There's no limits here."

O'Reilly agreed, adding that the two Fox News hosts "have fun and don't take it all that seriously." He then said that Williams had to go because "he's cutting a rap album or something."



rest at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/05/juan-williams-fox-news-stigmatized-dnc_n_1858656.html?ir=Media

The @GOP Platform's 12 Faultiest Claims

Republican Platform 2012
The Republican Party's 2012 platform includes a number of factual mistakes.

Last week, the Republican Party released its 2012 platform, a document that proposes sweeping reforms designed to limit the size and role of government in the United States. Mixed in there are some inaccuracies too.

The Romney campaign's stance on factually-based claims has been a subject of scrutiny lately. Just in the last few weeks, the media has called out Republican vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan for a number of factual mistakes and misleading assertions, and a Romney aide has said they would not let their "campaign be dictated by fact-checkers." Pay us no mind then.

Here are some of the GOP platform's faultiest claims:



rest at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/04/republican-platform-2012-factual-mistakes_n_1840795.html

Gina Rinehart, World's Richest Woman: Australia Is Too Expensive For Mining, Africans Will 'Work For Less Than $2 Per Day'

SYDNEY, Sept 5 (Reuters) - Asia's richest woman, mining magnate Gina Rinehart, warned on Wednesday that Australia was becoming too expensive for mining firms which she said could hire workers for under $2 a day in Africa.

Rinehart's comments, promptly denounced by Prime Minister Julia Gillard, coincide with growing concern about the strength of Australia's mining boom in the face of weaker demand from main customer China and tumbling prices of iron ore, its single biggest export earner.

In the past week, Australia's Fortescue Metals Group Ltd said it would slash capital spending by 25 percent and wind back expansion plans, while BHP Billiton Ltd has shelved a $20 billion copper and gold mine expansion in Australia and put all other approvals worldwide on hold.

"The evidence is inarguable that Australia is becoming too expensive and too uncompetitive to do export-oriented business," Rinehart told the Sydney Mining Club in a rare public appearance. A video of her address was posted on the club's website.

"Africans want to work, and its workers are willing to work for less than $2 per day," she said in the video. "Such statistics make me worry for this country's future.

"We are becoming a high-cost and high-risk nation for investment."

Rinehart, whom Forbes estimated to be worth $18 billion in February, opposes a recently introduced mining tax as well as taxes on carbon emissions, which has created tensions with Gillard's government.

Rinehart has also called for miners to be allowed to bring in foreign workers, and her company Hancock Prospecting was granted government approval in May to hire just over 1,700 foreign construction workers for her Roy Hill project in Western Australia.

Gillard criticised Rinehart's remarks, saying the resources sector was doing well and had an investment pipeline of $500 billion, of which nearly half was at an advanced stage.

"It's not the Australian way to toss people $2, to toss them a gold coin, and then ask them to work for a day," Gillard told reporters. "We support proper Australian wages and decent working conditions."

Rinehart's remarks are the latest to target the Australian economy. In a column published last week in a mining magazine, Rinehart said Australians needed to complain less and to work more if they wanted to be rich.

"There is no monopoly on becoming a millionaire. If you're jealous of those with more money don't just sit there and complain, do something to make more money yourself," she wrote in Australian Resources and Investment magazine. "Spend less time drinking, smoking and socialising and more time working." (Reporting by Damian Gill; editing by Miral Fahmy)

rest at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/05/gina-rinehart-australia-too-expensive_n_1856744.html

Paul Ryan picked bad time to want to end benefits: Food Stamps Hit Record High In June 2012 #p2 #tcot

A record 46.7 million Americans -- or roughly one in five adults -- used food stamps in June, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) recently reported.

Food stamp use has spiked 51 percent since October 2008, when the economy was in free fall. The number of Americans now using food stamps is roughly the same as the number of Americans living in poverty.

Republican vice presidential nominee Paul Ryan has proposed slashing food stamp spending and turning food stamps into a block grant program, as Republican leaders have blamed President Obama for the record rise in food stamp spending.

Food stamp benefits cost a record $71.81 billion in the 2011 fiscal year, up 43 percent from two years before, according to the USDA. (To put things in perspective, that's roughly one-tenth of federal defense spending in 2011.)

Obama at least can take credit for overseeing slower growth in food stamp use, which spiked 23 percent during his first year in office, according to the USDA. In contrast, between June of last year and June of this year, food stamp use grew only 3 percent.

Even with food stamps, many Americans are struggling to put food on the table. Nearly one in five Americans did not have enough money to pay for food some time in the past year, according to Gallup.

Some economists point to spending on food stamps as an effective way to jumpstart the economy, since every dollar spent on food stamps leads to $1.73 circulated through the economy, according to Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics.

(Hat tip: Bloomberg.)



rest at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/05/food-stamps-record-high-june-2012_n_1857224.html

progressives need to get out and vote! Wall Street Campaign Donations Set To Hit Record During 2012 Election

here http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/05/wall-street-campaign-donations_n_1858086.html?ir=Business

douchebag catching heat: CNN Petitioned To Fire Erick Erickson After Controversial Tweet

here http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/05/cnn-petitioned-fire-erick-erickson-tweet_n_1859115.html?ir=Media

Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Reforming Welfare and Gutting the Poor: A Bipartisan Platform #p2 #tcot

"The Romney camp's new attack line on the Obama administration--that he "gutted" the work requirements imposed on families receiving public assistance--has been widely debunked as a distortion of a mundane policy memo. But the real scandal here isn't what Obama did or didn't do to "workfare"; it's that both parties have gutted the welfare system as a whole to conduct a cruel social experiment on impoverished families.

As many watchdogs have pointed out, the memo in question from the Department of Health and Human Services basically offers states more flexibility to meet mandatory targets for moving people off of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and into gainful employment. This program, administered jointly through federal and state agencies, is the central plank of Clinton-era welfare reform, and its principal political aim has always been to reduce the statistical presence of the poor, not alleviating their poverty.


According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), as welfare reform approaches its Sweet Sixteen, TANF's track record contrasts bitterly with that of its predecessor, AFDC, which Reaganite conservatives had savaged as undeserved entitlement:


Over the last 16 years, the national TANF caseload has declined by 60 percent, even as poverty and deep poverty have worsened. While the official poverty rate among families declined in the early years of welfare reform, when the economy was booming and unemployment was extremely low, it started increasing in 2000 and now exceeds its 1996 level.


These opposing trends — TANF caseloads going down while poverty is going up — mean that a much smaller share of poor families receive cash assistance from TANF than they did prior to welfare reform.


This punitive approach to poverty has driven poor mothers of color further to the margins of the economy, making them even more politically invisible."


How Big Business Is Buying the Election #p2 #tcot

"On January 27, 2010, one year into his term, President Barack Obama used the occasion of his State of the Union address to issue a warning. The Supreme Court had just opened the "floodgates for special interests—including foreign corporations—to spend without limit in our elections." He was speaking about the ruling in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, in which the Court struck down nearly a century of law, granting corporations vast new leeway to influence the outcome of elections.


In the months after Obama's speech, the American Petroleum Institute, an oil industry trade association that represents hundreds of multinational oil and gas companies, would demonstrate just how prescient the president's warning was.


Before Citizens United, API had gone to battle with the president over his efforts to address global warming. It took out issue ads, hired lobbyists from K Street, and financed dubious studies to claim that even the most piecemeal legislative fixes, such as the Waxman-Markey bill designed to cap carbon emissions, would lead to economic ruin. The group spent $7.3 million on federal lobbying during the year the bill was being debated.

But as the 2010 midterm elections loomed, Citizens United handed API an additional arrow for its quiver. The group could now funnel undisclosed corporate donations directly to campaign entities. Among the oil executives leading API at the time — and still to this day—was Tofiq Al-Gabsani, a registered lobbyist for the Saudi government. Al-Gabsani is the chief executive of Saudi Refining Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Saudi Arabian Oil Company, the government-owned Saudi oil giant better known as Aramco.


Aramco, by means of its US subsidiary, is understood by insiders to be one of the top donors to API, where, according to the Washington Post, membership dues for the largest firms can be as much as $20 million a year. API has roughly 400 member firms, but only a small group of oil and gas industry CEOs sit on its board of directors, which oversees the trade association's major political campaigns, according to API state business filings and two former API executives. Alongside the top officials of such major American firms as ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips, one of those directors for the past three years has been Al-Gabsani."


.@mittromney Romney's Success at Bain Capital: The Scam as Business Model #p2 #tcot @barackobama

"Private equity companies like Bain Capital are not primarily about producing wealth. They profit largely by siphoning off wealth created elsewhere in the economy. There are many different ways in which this diversion of wealth is accomplished.


The simplest and most common trick is gaming the tax code. It is absolutely standard practice for private equity firms to immediately load up the companies they acquire with debt. This has two benefits for the PE companies. First, it allows them to get most of their money back right away. They end up with a heavily leveraged company, where the PE company is still in control, but has little of its own money at risk.


The other benefit is that the interest on the debt, unlike dividends paid out to shareholders, is tax deductible. This means that even if the PE company does nothing to improve the operations of a company it acquires, it will increase its profitability by reducing its taxes.But each of these people could take credit for building companies that produced wealth. That is not the case with Mitt Romney."


rest at http://truth-out.org/news/item/11316-romneys-success-at-bain-capital-the-scam-as-business-model

Yes, We Are Better Off! 2008 vs 2012 in charts #p2 #tcot @barackobama @gop


The Progress Report Banner

Yes, We Are Better Off!

Sep 4, 2012 | By ThinkProgress War Room

2008 v. 2012 in Six Charts

Four years ago, the economy was on the downslide and about to go into free fall. What became a painful recession and still-ongoing recovery could've been another Great Depression. And then President Obama and Democrats worked together to turn things around. Too many families are still struggling and more must be done, but it's an undeniable fact that we've made a lot progress since 2008.

Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan would implement the same conservative policies that crashed the economy in the first place — only on a much grander scale. Here's six charts to remind us what happened when conservatives last ran the show compared to where we are today under President Obama.

Evening Brief: Important Stories That You May Have Missed

Ten headlines from September 2008.

Ohio's GOP Secretary of State is just ignoring a court order about early voting that he disagrees with.

Hypocrisy alert: Romney-Ryan robocall accuses President Obama of "changing [Medicare] forever."

GOP Senate candidate: throw rape victims who get an abortion in jail for life.

Mitt Romney on whether we're better off: "of course it's getting better."

Highlights from the Democratic Party's official platform.

Exposed: the Tea Party's deficit hypocrisy.

More questions about Mitt Romney's highly questionable finances.

Trouble for Mitt Romney in Virginia.

 


THINKPROGRESS | Center for American Progress Action Fund
1333 H Street NW, 10th Floor | Washington, DC 20005




Monday, September 3, 2012

.@mittromney Look through exclusive documents detailing the FDIC's rescue of Bain & Company #p2 #tcot

To uncover the true story behind the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's $10 million bailout of Mitt Romney and Bain & Company, Rolling Stone made a Freedom of Information Act request that forced the FDIC to release more than 500 of pages of records. (The government, which was owed more than $30 million in all, had become a creditor to Bain when it took over the failed Bank of New England in early 1991.)

Prior to releasing the documents, the FDIC allowed Bain & Company to scour and redact the records. Dozens of pages were blacked out entirely, on Bain's claim that these nearly two-decade-old records contain secret "commercial or financial information." Most pages looked something like the image at left.



Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/pictures/mitt-romneys-federal-bailout-the-documents-20120829#ixzz25R0QOZn9

rest at   http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/pictures/mitt-romneys-federal-bailout-the-documents-20120829