Tuesday, November 6, 2012

Chrysler gives workers day off to vote

http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/11/chrysler-gives-workers-day-off-to-vote-148617.html

The car company that attacked Mitt Romney for falsely claiming it was moving operations overseas is going a step further, ostensibly for President Obama.

Chrysler's vice president of design, Ralph Gilles, tweeted Tuesday that the company gave its entire work force the day off to vote. "Let's go!" he wrote.

UAW has been a stalwart supporter of the president and Obama has campaigned heavily on his decision to bail out the auto industry, particularly in the critical swing state of Ohio, where one in eight jobs depends on the industry.

Last week, Chrysler CEO Sergio Marchionne pushed back on a Romney ad that asserted the company was moving Jeep manufacturing to China. Gilles also pushed back on the assertion when it was made by Donald Trump last week. Gilles tweeted Trump "you are full of ----!"

UPDATE: Reuters' autos reporter Deepa Seetharaman points out this article from the New York Times, which says all auto workers were given Election Day off in contract negotiations several years ago, something the GOP was not happy about.

''That will be the biggest corporate contribution in American political history,'' Gov. John Engler of Michigan told the Times at the time, ''because the corporations will be paying the wages and the U.A.W. will be using the manpower to attempt to defeat Republican candidates.''


.@ChicagosMayor For voters in Chicago, there’s another pension ballot item. It’s a hoax. @RahmEmanuel

http://preaprez.wordpress.com/2012/10/17/for-voters-in-chicago-theres-another-pension-ballot-item-its-a-hoax/


For voters in the City of Chicago there will be two public pension issues on the ballot on November 6th.

The first one you will see is Mike Madigan's Constitutional Amendment. I have written about it. So have others. We will have more to say.

Vote no.

When I got my sample ballot, there was another pension issue down on the bottom of the first page.

"Shall the State of Illinois provide funding for the normal cost of pensions for Chicago teachers in the same manner as the State pays for the normal cost of  teacher pensions in every other school district in the state which will free up local funding that can be invested in the classroom?"

Unlike the Constitutional Amendment, this is an advisory measure. It is not binding on anyone.

It is also a hoax, perpetrated by Mayor Emanuel and the City Council.

The city's pension obligation to CPS teachers was transferred from the state several decades ago. The city has done no better job a meeting this contractual obligation than the state has. The city has had a habit of declaring numerous pension "holidays." These are years when they paid nothing into the pension fund. The city, like the state, now owes the CPS teachers big time.

Remember that Chicago teachers pay 9% of their salary into the pension fund. The board is supposed to pay around 6%. The board mostly hasn't paid much of anything. If they were private sector employers that didn't meet their Social Security payments (Chicago teachers like teachers in the rest of Illinois receive no Social Security), they would be in violation of federal law.

One of the ways in which the Democrats are trying to screw us is by calling for transferring the cost of the pension obligation to local school districts. The idea of a cost shift has not been lost on the  Little Democrat on the fifth floor of City Hall, who wants to transfer the city's cost of its pension obligation to the state. The state already is responsible for paying part of the Chicago pension obligation.

It was the Mayor who came up with the idea of putting the pension issue on the ballot.

He did it without talking to anybody on the board of trustees of the city's teacher pension fund.

This is where the scam part comes in.

Some folks in the CTU have said to me that the real reason the issue is even on the ballot has nothing to do with pensions. There is a limit to the number of advisory questions that can be on the ballot. The Mayor's real intention was to keep the elected school board off the city-wide ballot by blocking it with the pension issue.

Democracy, The Chicago Way.


Saturday, November 3, 2012

Greek journalist acquitted for leaking list of wealthy potential tax dodgers

from http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/nov2012/gree-n03.shtml

Greek investigative journalist Kostas Vaxevanis has been acquitted at a court in Athens of breaching data privacy laws. After a 12-hour hearing, he was found innocent by the three-judge panel.

Vaxevanis faced up to two years in jail and a €30,000 fine, after he was arrested and dragged before the court in a matter of days for having published in a magazine he edits a list of 1,991 Greek citizens who had a bank account at the HSBC bank in Switzerland.

The list is known as the "Lagarde List", because it was passed on to International Monetary Fund chief Christine Lagarde when she was French finance minister in 2010. She passed the list to the Greek authorities, who over the past two years have done nothing to investigate the possibility of large-scale tax evasion by the high-profile individuals on it, which include politicians, their relatives and businessmen such as shipping magnates.

The concealing of the list was carried out by successive governments and implicates the entire Greek political establishment. Involved are conservative New Democracy, the social democratic PASOK, as well as their partner in the coalition which came to power in June, the Democratic Left (a split from SYRIZA—Coalition of the Radical Left). Even as Vaxevanis was acquitted, the new finance minister, Yannis Stournaras, claimed in parliament that he had still not seen the data.

So determined were the Greek authorities to avoid any investigation that then Greek finance minister, George Papaconstantinou, recently claimed he had lost the memory stick containing the names. Only at that point did current PASOK leader Evangelos Venizelos, a former finance minister under Prime Minister George Papandreou, reveal that he had the data. He had felt it was unable to be produced as evidence of tax evasion because it was "stolen" in its original form.

It was under these conditions that Vaxevanis published the list. He was conducting a live radio interview when he was arrested last Sunday morning in scenes reminiscent of the conditions that existed under the military junta in Greece between 1967 and 1974.

An hour before his arrest he tweeted, "Outside my home are 15 policemen. Let them come in and arrest me like German collaborators"—a reference to the war-time Greek regime that welcomed the Nazi occupation.

Such was the disregard for elementary democratic precepts that Vaxevanis's charge sheet was not stamped by the prosecutor. Commenting on his arrest, one of his lawyers, Harris Ikonomopoulos, said, "It was as if he was conspiring to kill the prime minister. The warrant was issued as soon as [Mr. Vaxevanis's] magazine hit the streets and unmarked police cars lined the streets. There is a strike of judges in Greece tomorrow and yet the case will go ahead. The state does not do this even to major gangsters."

In court Vaxevanis stated that he did not breach any data laws as he did not specify the amount of the deposits or any other personal information of the people on the list. Commenting in the Guardian following his release on bail, he stated, "We did not even allege that these individuals were guilty, only called for an investigation."

In a comment given to Reuters between his arrest and trial he said, "If anyone is accountable before the law then it is those ministers who hid the list, lost it and said it didn't exist. I only did my job. I am a journalist and I did my job."

The Greek state wanted to silence Vaxevanis as a warning to anyone seeking to challenge the criminal conspiracy of the super-rich to impose the crisis they have created onto the backs of working people while they live in the lap of luxury. Calling for his conviction, the prosecutor noted the anger building up against the super-rich. He said to Vaxevanis, "You have publicly ridiculed a series of people. You have delivered these people to a society that is thirsty for blood."

In finding Vaxevanis not guilty, the court no doubt took into account widespread support for his stand. His magazine Hot Doc, which normally has a circulation of about 25,000, sold 100,000 copies of the edition containing the list.

Vaxevanis told the Daily Telegraph, "Greece is run by a closed oligarchy of businessmen, politicians and controlled media groups. My publication of the list marked a confrontation, an extreme confrontation.

"They have lost face and credibility with the publication of this list. They can no longer play hide and seek, and they cannot demand the little old lady in a village to make more painful sacrifices and have her pension cut when a small group of oligarchs continues to grow wealthy."

He added, "A study of the Lagarde list is highly revealing. Publishers, businessmen, shipowners, the entire system of power is shown to have transferred money abroad. And this is information from only one bank. Meanwhile in Greece, people are going through dumpsters for food."

It wasn't until Vaxevanis published the list that a major newspaper, the daily Ta Nea, also published its contents.

In his October 30 Guardian piece, Vaxevanis noted how a pliant media has collaborated in the cover-up of the high crimes of the ruling elite. "A few months ago, Reuters and the British press uncovered scandals involving Greek banks", he wrote. "The Greek media didn't write anything then either. The space that should have been granted to reports about these scandals was occupied by paid advertisements sponsored by the very people who caused the Greek banks to go under."

According to Papaconstantinou, the amount of money owned by those on the Lagarde List, which dated back to 2007, is €1.5 billion (US$1.9 billion). However, Vaxevanis contends that more than €13 billion (US$16.7 billion) had moved through the accounts on the list between 1998 and 2007. "Our view is that some account holders moved large amounts of black money through their HSBC account in Geneva to invest in foreign funds or deposit in safe havens elsewhere", he said.

These figures are only the tip of the iceberg. According to figures reported last June by Der Spiegel, the sums salted away by Greek millionaires and billionaires in Swiss accounts amounts to €600 billion. This is twice the total public debt of Greece.

Moreover, Lagarde or any other representative of the financial elite could have produced a similar list detailing the financial swindling of the ruling elite in any of the more powerful countries in Europe that would make the Greek millionaire and billionaire swindlers look like petty thieves. The original file containing the Greek data, which is in the hands of the French police, includes the Swiss bank account details of 130,000 potential tax evaders.


In the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy: Aid for Coney Island too little and too late #p2 #tcot @fema @barackabama

from http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/nov2012/cone-n03.shtml

New York City's Coney Island was badly hit by Hurricane Sandy on Tuesday night and has received minimal aid from government agencies.

Although it is known for its beaches, amusement park and other attractions, the peninsula of Coney Island along the Atlantic Ocean in Brooklyn is also a predominantly working-class community of 50,000 people. But one would have little idea that a disaster had struck this community by reading or listening to the official media in New York or nationwide.

Flood waters four to six feet high deluged the streets, knocked out gas and electricity and irreparably damaged many homes and businesses. Cars floated away or were otherwise destroyed by the water. Power was only restored to parts of the neighborhood on Thursday, and some people still do not have heat, even as the temperatures continue to drop in the evenings.

Stores have been destroyed or stopped functioning, and food has begun to rot in people's houses and apartments.

lineupLine for gas in Brooklyn

Transportation to and from Coney Island has become a hardship. Subways have stopped running to the area, and bus service is infrequent and crowded. Indeed, traffic is snarled throughout south Brooklyn. Thousands of drivers queue up for a diminishing supply of gas.

The reaction of the city government has been to send hundreds of police into the neighborhood to keep order, but almost nothing in the way of supplies, generators, pumps or temporary housing.

On Friday, for the first time since the storm, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) had set up a small encampment and begun distributing food. By the time World Socialist Web Site reporters arrived in the afternoon, FEMA was turning away residents, telling them that they had run out of supplies.

The official neglect has created a sense of outrage in the neighborhood. It was not lost on residents that the affluent gated community of Sea Gate that abuts the Coney Island neighborhood saw the arrival of fire trucks and ambulances hours after the storm subsided, while the working-class residents had to wait days to receive any help at all.

At the FEMA encampment, the World Socialist Web Site spoke to a number of Coney Island residents about their experiences with the storm and the official neglect afterwards.

HerbertHerbert and Shante

Herbert Norwood, a maintenance worker, told us, "On Monday, there were buses to evacuate the elderly, but I didn't see them putting anyone on. On Tuesday, the water came rushing down and knocked down a lot of trees, and knocked out the power. Cars were moving in the flood. My electricity went out. It was my wife and me.

"When the water receded there really wasn't that much help. I saw Con Edison, but they went down to Sea Gate. They dealt with them first. They didn't help us or the people in the [housing] projects. No power, no water, no Internet. Everything was gone, so we left.

"I asked the police why the response was so slow, and they said, 'Well, they'll get to it.' They just forgot about us. They were worried about Manhattan – I know that's the moneymaking place. A lot of people need help here, too. All of the ambulances were headed toward Sea Gate. The police never knocked on people's doors. Down there in Sea Gate they did. I think we deserve the same treatment.

"I just learned that FEMA came down. I went over to the Rockaways. It's crazy there too. We work the same as the rich do. Just give us a fair shake. The power is still out in New Jersey. All this money they have, giving it to Central Park? Come on."

His wife Shante said, "We have eight kids at home. After the second day of no power we had to go stay with a relative in Queens. We have power now, but the food is spoiled." We asked her about the politicians who were congratulating themselves for a job well done in the aftermath of the storm, and Shante replied, "What job well done? I don't see a job well done. There are a lot of people in Coney Island still in need. We don't have anything."

TerrenceTerrance Williams and William Banks

An unemployed worker, William Banks said, "We live at the end of Coney Island, a block away from Sea Gate. We were just lucky that we didn't die. Our basement is flooded. There is nobody to pump out the water so we're going to have to move. Everything is damaged. The clothing is gone. The food is gone. There's no hot water. We have no light and this has been since Tuesday.

"The New York City Police Department brought us food, but it was inedible. There was no water to cook it in. They didn't bring us even a loaf of bread, just military rations and dog food. Why did they bring that to us? People are hungry here. We don't have nutritious food. People shouldn't have to live like this. I think they're trying to wrap this up."

His friend Terrance added, "The reaction from FEMA was if you don't have a bank account and a certain financial status, you're in a lot of trouble. That is wrong. We're human, too."

Andre Brown, a transit supervisor and resident also spoke to us. "We can't take this loss. There are no stores. Everything was looted but the police came after the fact.

AndreAndre Brown

"They asked us to evacuate before the storm. A lot of people thought this would be like [Hurricane] Irene, not so bad. We were doing okay until the lights went out and the water got shut off. We live on the 15th floor and we were basically stranded for about two days.

"We had radios and we wanted to find out what was going on, but we heard nothing about Coney Island. We were wondering what was gong on, what kind of help we were going to get, who was going to be sent out here to assist us. We got none of that. We asked family and friends, what kind of media coverage are you seeing about Coney Island, and the answer was basically nothing. We didn't get anything until Wednesday.

"We know there were a lot of elderly that were stranded. We heard fire and ambulances, but my understanding was that they were gong to Sea Gate. They weren't here. The people were forgotten here. We're working families and they have more powerful people behind those gates. It's atrocious that we have to go through so much."


Anger boils over at lack of US storm relief #p2 #tcot @barackobama @fema

from http://www.wsws.org/articles/2012/nov2012/sand-n03.shtml

With the death toll from Hurricane Sandy climbing towards 100, and several million people in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut facing a fifth day without electricity, heat and, in many cases, food and water, anger and frustration has boiled over at the failure of the federal, state and local governments to provide adequate relief.

The storm, like Hurricane Katrina seven years ago, has laid bare the immense social inequalities that saturate every facet of American society, nowhere more starkly than in New York City, among the hardest hit areas on the US Eastern Seaboard.

Discontent among residents of the city's predominantly working class outer boroughs as well as of those in public housing developments in lower Manhattan has grown daily, with many charging that those who run the city were concerned only with the needs of Manhattan's stock brokers and multi-millionaires and had no problem seeing working class and poor people living in hunger, cold and darkness for days on end.

These popular sentiments—and the concerns that they had provoked within ruling circles—broke to the surface of political events Friday night with the sudden announcement by the office of billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg that the city's annual New York City Marathon scheduled for Sunday, November 4 had been cancelled for the first time in 40 years.

A statement issued jointly by City Hall and the New York Road Runners club stated: "The marathon has always brought our city together and inspired us with stories of courage and determination. We would not want a cloud to hang over the race or its participants, and so we have decided to cancel it."

The announcement came just hours after Bloomberg had held a press conference at City Hall insisting that the marathon would go on and would not divert any resources from providing relief to the victims of the storm. While discussing how restaurants that he frequents were just as full as ever and selling even more wine, he insisted that the race would "give people something to cheer about." He invoked as a precedent the decision of his predecessor, Rudy Giuliani, to hold the marathon in the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks.

Outrage had quickly built amid news reports that generators were being set up in Central Park to power media tents and other amenities for the runners, while food and water was being trucked in for them as well. Meanwhile, in the city's public housing, residents were forced to fill jugs and buckets from fire hydrants and lug them up as many as 17 floors.

No such resources as those made available for the Marathon were provided to city hospitals forced to shut down and evacuate their patients under dangerous conditions for lack of generators, or to the many thousands of residents of devastated neighborhoods in Staten Island, the Rockaway section of Queens, Coney Island in Brooklyn and elsewhere. In these areas, people have been left stranded amid devastation, without means of transportation or communication.

Residents in Staten Island, the borough where the New York Marathon was set to start and where the majority of the city's over 41 storm fatalities have taken place, put up a hand-lettered sign reading "F.U. Mayor and your Marathon." People standing on long lines waiting for food and water from FEMA erupted in anger against Bloomberg and the subordination of the relief efforts to the interests of the most privileged layers of society.

While some 40,000 people had reportedly already come to the city to participate in Sunday's marathon, approximately a third of them from other countries, opposition to holding the race surfaced among the runners themselves.

Penny Krakoff, a social worker from Crown Heights, Brooklyn who was set to participate in the marathon, wrote, "I cannot start a 26.2 mile run in Staten Island—people are missing, stranded, in need of resources. Brooklyn and Queens have equal devastation. Parts of Manhattan are without electricity, water, major hospitals are closed."

She said she would catch the marathon bus to the starting point at the Staten Island end of the Verrazano Bridge on Sunday, where she would turn in her official bib and instead volunteer and gather resources to help the people suffering in that borough, the hardest hit by the storm. Other runners promised to break off from the race at different parts of the city to deliver supplies to areas without power.

City sanitation workers, who have been putting in shifts of 12 hours and more, also protested at being assigned to clean up after the marathon rather than participating in the recovery work in Staten Island, Brooklyn and Queens, where many of them live.

A Staten Island hotel manager announced that he would not honor 160 advance reservations from marathon runners, as rooms were already occupied by some 700 people made homeless by the storm.

Meanwhile, a number of city Democratic politicians, some of them seeking to run to succeed Bloomberg as mayor, voiced opposition to the decision to go ahead with the race and there were suggestions within the financial press that ING, the Dutch-based investment bank that sponsors the marathon, was beginning to see the bitter denunciations of the marathon as a "branding disaster."

Underlying these concerns are real fears within ruling circles that the deprivation caused by Hurricane Sandy and its illumination of the stark divide between New York's financial aristocracy and the city's working class majority could lead to social upheavals.

Anger has also erupted in other areas of the East Coast. In Bridgeport, Connecticut's largest and one of its poorest cities, United Illuminating crews were pelted with eggs by residents amid charges that the electrical utility had concentrated its efforts on restoring electricity to Connecticut's wealthy suburban communities at Bridgeport's expense. The electrical firm pulled its crews out of the city, demanding greater police protection.

The feeling of millions that they have been abandoned in the face of the disaster is well-founded. After barely two days of Obama making ritualistic speeches about "neighbors helping neighbors" and Romney staging phony food drives, the campaigns returned to their normal lies as both big business parties prepare for far deeper attacks on the working class after the election is over. Bloomberg took time out to endorse Obama, whom he sees as a faithful defender of his and his fellow billionaires' interests.

The class divide in New York found glaring expression in the ability of the New York Stock Exchange to open for business on Wednesday morning, just hours after Bellevue Hospital, also in the area that had suffered the loss of electricity, was forced to evacuate more than 700 patients under dangerous conditions because of a lack of power. One doctor told the New York Times that water could be heard pouring through the elevators "like Niagara running through the hospital. The phones didn't work. We lost all communications between floors. We were in the dark all night. No water to wash hands—I mean, we're doctors!"

Mass transit and electricity has returned only slowly to the New York-New Jersey area four days after Hurricane Sandy made landfall. Most of Lower Manhattan had power restored by late Friday, but many thousands of families in the outer boroughs and in other areas of New York and New Jersey will have to wait at least another week, if not until the end of November, to have their electricity back. Temperatures are dipping down into the 30s, with a real threat that the death toll from the storm will be augmented by more deaths caused by government and corporate negligence and criminality.

The latest estimates of economic damages from the storm were some $50 billion, double what had been estimated a few days earlier. It is believed that only about one-third of losses will be covered by insurance. The estimate places Hurricane Sandy among the most destructive storms in US history, and significant additional losses would bring it close to the devastation of Katrina, which caused $157 billion in damages.


Department of Homeland Security Wants Nerds For a New "Cyber Reserve'"

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/11/01/2225252/department-of-homeland-security-wants-nerds-for-a-new-cyber-reserve

"Just three weeks after Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told an audience at the Sea, Air and Space Museum that the U.S. is on the brink of a 'cyber Pearl Harbor,' the government has decided it needs to beef up the ranks of its digital defenses. It's assembling a league of extraordinary computer geeks for what will be known as the 'Cyber Reserve.'"

More Than 25% of Android Apps Know Too Much About You

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/11/02/1316238/more-than-25-of-android-apps-know-too-much-about-you

"A pair of reports by Juniper and Bit9 confirm the suspicion that many apps are spying on users. '26 percent of Android apps in Google Play can access personal data, such as contacts and email, and 42 percent, GPS location data... 31 percent of the apps access phone calls or phone numbers, and 9 percent employ permissions that could cost the user money, such as incurring premium SMS text message charges... nearly 7 percent of free apps can access address books, 2.6 percent, can send text messages without the user knowing, 6.4 percent can make calls, and 5.5 percent have access to the device's camera.' The main issue seems to be with poor development practices. Only in a minority of cases is there malicious intent. The Juniper report and the Bit9 report are both available online."

US Government: You Don't Own Your Cloud Data So We Can Access It At Any Time

http://yro.slashdot.org/story/12/11/02/1737219/us-government-you-dont-own-your-cloud-data-so-we-can-access-it-at-any-time

"On Tuesday the EFF filed a brief proposing a process for the Court in the Megaupload case to hold the government accountable for the actions it took (and failed to take) when it shut down Megaupload's service and denied third parties access to their property. Many businesses used Megaupload's cloud service to store and share files not related to piracy. The government is calling for a long, drawn-out process that would require individuals or small companies to travel to courts far away and engage in multiple hearings just to get their own property back. Additionally, the government's argument that you lose all your property rights by storing your data on the cloud could apply to Amazon's S3 or Google Apps or Apple iCloud services as well (see page 4 of their filing)."

Dr. Dave Ores - FREE medical care for New York City (Lower East Side) 189 East 2nd St. btw ave A & B

http://www.facebook.com/TheOther98

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/26/nyregion/thecity/26doct.html?_r=1&

Dr. Dave Ores - FREE medical care for New York City (Lower East Side) 189 East 2nd St. btw ave A & B: http://bit.ly/DrDavidOres


.@mittromney mitt's fake photo opportunity vs occupy movement delivering food via canoe's - who really cares about us? #p2 #tcot

from http://www.facebook.com/TheOther98


.@fema Rockaway, Queens dire situation - no fema, no food, no media coverage - pass on! @ABC

http://www.facebook.com/kevincanessa/posts/10152236953860177

Received an email from a college buddy of mine who lives in Rockaway, Queens, just a moment ago. And it's not good. He says there has been little sign on FEMA or help from the City, there's little food left, there's no media there, most have no alternate means of housing, many have no way to get away from Rockaway -- a
nd it's simply dire. I know there are members of the City's media reading this right now -- so if there's any way you can help, please, please reach out to editors and assignment desks and get reporters and camera crews out there. The residents of Rockaway (and likely Breezy, too) appear to have been forgotten, but are no less or more important than those in Midtown Manhattan. Thank you, in advance, for helping.

Big Oil, Gas & Coal pumped $184,994,697 into denying climate change this year. Pass it on #p2 #tcot

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Friends-of-Democracy/408595662519575


Friday, November 2, 2012

Fox News Focuses On Benghazi Attack While Largely Ignoring Hurricane Sandy

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/01/fox-news-benghazi-obama_n_2059933.html

Fox News prime-time hosts barely mentioned Hurricane Sandy on Wednesday night, even as MSNBC and CNN reported non-stop on the massive cleanup efforts just south of Fox's Manhattan studio and throughout the surrounding region devastated by the storm.

Instead, the Fox News hosts focused on the upcoming presidential election and the Sept. 11, 2012, consulate attack in Benghazi, Libya -- a story that's been a mainstay on the cable network over the past six weeks amid suggestions of a White House cover-up. While Fox News correspondents have done solid reporting and raised legitimate questions for the Obama administration to answer, some of the network's on-air hosts have been fanning the flames of conspiracy in what's been dubbed "Benghazi-gate."

"The White House was quick to release a picture of the president from the Situation Room watching the bin Laden raid and then Hurricane Sandy two days ago," said Sean Hannity on Wednesday night, in his only mention of the natural disaster during his hourlong 9 p.m. show. "Where's the photo from the night four Americans died in Benghazi?"

None of Fox News' prime-time hosts brought up President Barack Obama's response to the storm, which included touring the battered New Jersey shore with Republican Gov. Chris Christie earlier on Wednesday. Joe Trippi, a Democratic strategist and Fox News contributor, did bring up that bipartisan moment, which shows the president in a light more positive than he typically receives on the Roger Ailes-run network. But immediately after Trippi's segment on the election, host Greta Van Susteren teased the next one: "Did the Obama administration deliberately mislead Americans about Libya?" she asked.

Fox News' 9 p.m. host had similar questions on his mind Wednesday.

"What did the president know? When did he know it?" Hannity asked former Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich. During the segment, Hannity zeroed in on "three aspects" of inquiry "before, during and after" -- meaning who was involved in determining the level of security at the Benghazi compound before the attack, who decided whether to send assistance during it, and who determined how the attack would be publicly described afterward.

This past Friday, Fox's Pentagon correspondent Jennifer Griffin published a reportalleging that CIA agents in an annex near the diplomatic compound had requested backup three times during the assault and were denied. She wrote that former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods and two others disobeyed orders to stand down and went to the main compound to help. Woods was later killed in fighting back at the intelligence annex.

On Wednesday, Fox's Catherine Herridge reported on a previously unseen cable from a security officer in Benghazi, who raised concerns that the compound would not be able to fend off a "coordinated attack."

Herridge's story matches otherassertions from security officers at the compound that they did not have enough security and further undercuts the Obama administration's early suggestions that the attack was simply a response to an obscure anti-Islam video.

Fox News hosts have gone further, seeking to draw the president directly into the controversy, something the evidence has yet to support. In place of hard evidence, Fox analysts and hosts have turned largely to rumor and speculation, homing in on suggestions that Obama may have personally blocked, or failed to order, a rescue mission during the assault.

One of the most dramatic claims came from Hannity himself, who said on Tuesday night that he had been told about -- but not heard -- an audiotape in which Woods and other agents could be heard "begging for help" from supervisors.

"My sources tell me it's pretty damning," Hannity said Tuesday. "You'll learn it here first."

That same night, Gingrich told Van Susteren that he had heard a "rumor" that other television networks had emails from the White House ordering that the CIA agents not help those under attack.

"There is a rumor -- I want to be clear, it's a rumor -- that at least two networks have emails from the National Security Advisor's office telling a counterterrorism group to stand down," Gingrich said.

Gingrich's rumor was picked up Wednesday by The Daily Caller, a news and opinion site edited by Fox News contributor Tucker Carlson. The Drudge Report, an influential conservative aggregator, then splashed a link to the article across its site. Also on Wednesday, Gingrich repeated his claim to Hannity and denounced the White House for failing to offer a full timeline of its actions during the attack.

Back on the network Wednesday, following the White House's flat denial of the claim that it halted aid to those under attack, Gingrich said to Hannity, "There were clearly people in Benghazi asking for assistance. So what does that mean? Does it mean it was cut off somewhere? That the president, although he's commander in chief, did not know that they were asking for assistance?"

The CIA and the White House have denied all reports that they refused assistance that night, and Griffin's original Fox report does not state explicitly who supposedly denied the request for help, pinning the blame on "the CIA chain of command" and "higher-ups at the [secure] annex."

Both Griffin and CBS have reported that a special operations rescue unit was available just a few hours away in Sicily, but that it was not dispatched until after the attack was over.

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said last week that the decision to send in a rescue team is not undertaken lightly or without a solid understanding of what they will encounter. "The basic principle is that you don't deploy forces into harm's way without knowing what's going on, without having some real-time information about what's taking place," Panetta said.

That danger was highlighted by something else that Fox's Griffin reported. Glen Doherty, one of the former SEALs who died during the fighting in Benghazi, was part of a "quick-reaction force" that arrived from Tripoli amid the attack, she wrote.

But uncertainty hasn't stopped Fox News from airing speculation about the president's response to the attack. When Van Susteren on Wednesday asked Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), who sits on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, what might have happened with the rescue team, he responded, "If they were ordered to do so, they would have gone in there and helped save those people. But they did not, because I don't believe the president gave that order."

The narrative of events in Benghazi promoted by Fox News, which has an outsized role in the conservative-media echo chamber, has been slammed by liberal media watchdogs as hyperventilation ahead of a tight presidential election. The intensity of its coverage has also given rise to numerous, perhaps inevitable, complaints that other outlets were ignoring the story.

The tone of the Fox News coverage has come under some criticism from individuals at the network.

On Wednesday night, Fox host Geraldo Rivera took to Twitter to decry the "GOP bloodlust" about the Benghazi incident, calling it "insincere" and "desperate." Referring specifically to the often-repeated claim on Fox that Obama failed to send a rescue team that would have saved the former SEALs, Rivera described such a moveas unfeasible and militarily unprecedented. "Life is not an action movie," he said.

And Juan Williams, a Fox News analyst considered to be on the liberal side of the network's political spectrum, recently wrote a column in The Hill newspaper in which he bashed the "deliberate misinformation" campaign of the Republican Party over Benghazi.

Without naming Fox directly, Williams offered "corrections" to three claims often made on the network: that Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, deliberately misled the public on the cause of the attack; that more security would have helped those in Benghazi; and that the episode is proof of a resurgent al Qaeda.

"Once the political spin stops, the bottom line is there is no evidence so far to support the Romney camp's claim of incompetence or a cover-up by the administration," said Williams, who has sparred on air with Hannity about the attack. "There is only a tragic attack on the United States, our understanding of which is becoming clearer as new intelligence comes to light."


Brian Williams Rips Rush Limbaugh, Former FEMA Chief Michael Brown Over Hurricane Sandy; Limbaugh Responds (VIDEO)

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/02/brian-williams-rush-limbaugh-sandy_n_2065218.html


Brian Williams ripped Rush Limbaugh and former FEMA director Michael Brown for their comments in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy on Thursday. Limbaugh later hit back at Williams on his radio show.

Williams, a native New Jerseyan, devoted the full hour of "Rock Center" to the devastation wrought by the hurricane. In his monologue, he turned his attention to Brown, who was in charge of FEMA during Hurricane Katrina. Brown has advised people to "chill out" in the wake of Sandy.

"Something we intend to pass along to these homeowners in Mantaloking, New Jersey, as soon as the embers from their homes have thoroughly cooled," Williams said in response on Thursday. He added that Brown was responsible for the "largest domestic human rights outrage of the modern era."

Williams also praised New Jersey governor Chris Christie, who he said has been "tactile and indefatigable" in his handling of the crisis. President Obama and Christie recently visited devastated areas of New Jersey together.

"So after all this loss you might be curious as to why Rush Limbaugh went after Gov. Christie today," he continued. "It was because he was getting along so well with the president, working together, saying nice things about Barack Obama."

"Just when we feared the storm wiped away everything, we learned politics survived," Williams concluded.

"Brian, come on, what do you think the stroll on the beach with Obama and Christie was?" Limbaugh exclaimed in response on his Friday radio show. "It was politics!"

He argued that the two appeared together in the aftermath of the hurricane for political purposes only.

"Walk on the beach accomplished what?" Limbaugh continued. I live in Realville. Hugging the woman accomplished what?" He said that Christie and Obama should have been in a command center coordinating relief efforts, and that the resources required for Obama's visit added even more trouble.

Then, he turned his attention to NBC News, asking Williams:

Have you watched your network lately? Have you watched your sister or brother network... MSNBC, lately? You guys have your own mess to clean up there. Because you and your colleagues, you're not only destroying news and journalism in this country, you're not even doing your job. Does Benghazi ring a bell to any of you at NBC? Does the name alert you to anything? I know it's not as cool as Iran-Contra or Watergate or Katrina — those all involve Republicans. But you know, Brian, four Americans died, as it turns out, unnecessarily. They were murdered. And people were trying to get answers, and NBC doesn't care. NBC is helping to cover it up.


.@gop Republicans Censor Government Report That Debunks 'Tax Cuts Create Jobs' Myth #p2 #tcot

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/politics/2012-election/republicans-censor-government-report-debunks-tax-cuts-create-jobs-myth?utm_source=OV+Newsletter+List+2&utm_campaign=43bc61ec35-OV_Newsletter_November_211_2_2012&utm_medium=email

The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service (CRS) issued a report back in September that showed that tax breaks for wealthy Americans did not help the economy or create job growth.

The report debunked a long-held Republican talking point that cutting taxes for the wealthy somehow creates jobs for the middle class, reports the New York Times.

The report stated: "There is not conclusive evidence, however, to substantiate a clear relationship between the 65-year steady reduction in the top tax rates and economic growth. However, the top tax rate reductions appear to be associated with the increasing concentration of income at the top of the income distribution."

However, the report was withdrawn because Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said that Republicans were offended by words in the report such as "Bush tax cuts" and "tax cuts for the rich."

The New York Times reports:

Senate Republican aides said they protested both the tone of the report and its findings. Aides to Mr. McConnell presented a bill of particulars to the research service that included objections to the use of the term "Bush tax cuts" and the report's reference to "tax cuts for the rich," which Republicans contended was politically freighted.

Economist Jared Bernstein said the report was sound and the Republican attack "sounds to me like a complete political hit job."

President Obama has promised to allow the Bush tax cuts on the top two income tax rates to expire in January, lifting the rates from 33 and 35 percent, and from 36 percent and 39.6 percent, where they were during most of the Clinton administration, which provided far more economic growth than the Bush administration.