Tuesday, February 12, 2013

share with your right-wing friends the next time they yap about how much POTUS spends #p2 #tcot

source http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/12/treasury-budget-surplus_n_2672053.html

Treasury Department Reports $3 Billion Budget Surplus In January, Shrinking Deficit

WASHINGTON — The federal government reported a rare surplus for January and is on track to run the lowest annual deficit since President Barack Obama took office.

The Treasury Department said Tuesday that the government took in a surplus of $2.9 billion in January, helped by nearly $9 billion more in Social Security taxes. Last month Congress and the White House allowed a temporary cut in Social Security taxes to expire.

The monthly surplus was the first since September.

Through the first four months of the 2013 budget year, the deficit has grown $290.4 billion. That's nearly $60 billion lower than the same period a year ago.

Revenue through those four months is 12.4 percent higher compared with the same period last year, while spending has grown only 3.5 percent.

The budget year began on Oct. 1.

The Congressional Budget Office forecasts that the deficit will total $845 billion when the budget year ends on Sept. 30. If correct, that would be first time the government has run annual deficit below $1 trillion since 2008.

The deficit is the amount the government must borrow when its expenses exceed its revenue. Each month's deficit is volatile and can be affected by calendar quirks that shift government spending or revenue from one month to another.

The annual deficit is projected to be smaller this year because the government is collecting more revenue this year, mainly because of faster job growth and higher taxes.

At the same time, the government is spending less on some programs. That's in part because of spending cuts that were enacted under a 2011 agreement to raise the federal borrowing limit. Also, the improved economy has reduced demand for unemployment benefits and some other government programs.

Last year, the economy grew at a modest 2.2 percent and generated an average of about 180,000 jobs a month. Stronger job growth is forecast for this year – an average of more than 200,000 a month, some economists say. More jobs mean more income, which generates more tax revenue for the government.

Another factor in a smaller expected deficit is higher taxes for some Americans this year. When Congress and the White House reached a deal in January to avert the fiscal cliff, they allowed taxes to rise on individuals earning at least $400,000 a year and couples earning $450,000. That is expected to raise $620 billion in revenue over the next decade.

And the agreement allowed a 2 percentage point cut in the Social Security tax to expire, thereby raising taxes on nearly everyone who earns a paycheck. This year's higher Social Security tax is projected to raise about $10 billion more a month in revenue.

The additional revenue is likely to slow the deficit's growth for the rest of the budget year. The deficit will also likely shrink in April, when the government collects much of its income-tax revenue. Last year, the government reported a surplus of $59 billion for April. A stronger economy could make this year's April surplus even larger.

Economists are also optimistic that this year's deficit could be smaller than $1 trillion. But much depends on negotiations in Washington over the next few weeks. On March 1, $85 billion in spending cuts are scheduled to take effect unless Congress and the White House reach a deal to avert them.

Cooper Howes, an economist at Barclays, said that if the full amount of reductions take place, that could trim overall economic growth by about one-half percentage point.

The CBO is projecting even smaller annual deficits of $616 billion in 2014 and $459 billion in 2015. But as more baby boomers retire and claim Medicare and Social Security, deficits would likely rise again. The implementation of the 2010 health care law would also widen deficits. The CBO forecasts that deficits could near $1 trillion again by 2023.

Republicans and President Barack Obama agree on the need for a plan to contain the deficits. But they are at odds over the details. Republicans want to trim growth in Social Security and Medicare spending but oppose any further tax increases.

Obama has said he is willing to consider cuts in the growth of entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security. But he argues that a balanced approach will require further tax increases on the highest earners.

Obama's presidency has coincided with four straight $1 trillion-plus deficits.

The gaps reached a record $1.41 trillion in budget year 2009, which began four months before Obama took office. That deficit was due largely to the worst recession since the Great Depression. Tax revenue plummeted. And the government spent more on stimulus programs.

The budget gaps in 2010 and 2011 were slightly lower than the 2009 deficit as a gradually strengthening economy generated more tax revenue.

President George W. Bush also ran annual deficits through most of his two terms in office after he won approval for broad tax cuts and launched wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

The last time the government ran an annual surplus was in 2001.


@barackobama - POTUS broke his promise of a year ago to investigate and criminally prosecute the financial crime of the century #p2 #tcot

source http://www.facebook.com/TheOther98


Despite killing the world's most-wanted terrorist, he said, he was not given a pension, health care or protection for himself or his family.

source http://wewillblowyourmind.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/seal-who-shot-bin-laden-speaks-out.html

http://www.esquire.com/features/man-who-shot-osama-bin-laden-0313?click=pp "

"The Man Who Killed Osama bin Laden... Is Screwed

For the first time, the Navy SEAL who killed Osama bin Laden tells his story — speaking not just about the raid and the three shots that changed history, but about the personal aftermath for himself and his family. And the startling failure of the United States government to help its most experienced and skilled warriors carry on with their lives."



Saturday, February 9, 2013

definition of a teaparty asshole: Joe Walsh Michelle Obama Funeral Flap: Tea Partier Rips FLOTUS For Going To Hadiya Pendleton Service

source http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/08/joe-walsh-michelle-obama-_n_2646699.html

Making good on his threat promise that he's not going away, ex-Congressman Joe Walsh reared his head Friday morning to blast the first lady for traveling to her hometown of Chicago to attend slain 15-year-old Hadiya Pendleton's funeral.

In a series of tweets first reported by DNAinfo Chicago, Walsh ripped Michelle Obama's attendance at the funeral of the teenaged inaugural performer as "political."

Walsh said via Twitter Friday:

News of Pendleton's Jan. 29 shooting death struck a chord nationwide, prompting outrage over the honor student's senseless slaying, gun control and the epidemic of shooting violence in Chicago.

After the King College Prep student was shot by a still at-large perp while standing under a park canopy to escape the rain, a petition was started urging President Obama to attend the teen's funeral.

Thursday, a White House official said Michelle Obama would attend the funeral, along with senior adviser Valerie Jarrett and U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan. Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn will also attend the funeral.

"As a mother and Chicagoan, the first lady was heartbroken to learn of the tragic loss of Hadiya Pendleton due to senseless gun violence," Kristina Schake, Michelle Obama communications director, told the Tribune Thursday.

According to WGN, a Friday visitation for Pendleton will be held at Calahan Funeral Home, 7030 S. Halsted St., from 2 p.m. to 9 p.m. The wake and funeral follow on Saturday beginning at 9 a.m. at the Greater Harvest Baptist Church at 5141 S. State St.

Walsh's criticism of the first lady attending the Pendleton service is not the first time the Tea Party favorite has lashed out on the topic of Chicago violence following a headline-grabbing tragedy. Last spring, after the death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin inspired Walsh's then-congressional colleague Bobby Rush to don a hoodie on the House floor, Walsh said he hoped Rush would "be as outraged with all of the black on black crime going on in the city of Chicago weekend after weekend" as he was with Martin's death.


rest at http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/08/joe-walsh-michelle-obama-_n_2646699.html

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

.@Equifax - HR Departments Tell @Equifax Your Entire Salary History - This salary information is for sale

source http://yro.slashdot.org/story/13/02/05/140224/hr-departments-tell-equifax-your-entire-salary-history

http://redtape.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/30/16762661-exclusive-your-employer-may-share-your-salary-and-equifax-might-sell-that-data

"CLARIFICATION: This story was updated Feb. 1 with additional information about Kathy Sandy's Work Number disclosure report.

The Equifax credit reporting agency, with the aid of thousands of human resource departments around the country, has assembled what may be the most powerful and thorough private database of Americans' personal information ever created, containing 190 million employment and salary records covering more than one-third of U.S. adults.

Some of the information in the little-known database, created through an Equifax-owned company called The Work Number, is sold to debt collectors, financial service companies and other entities.

"It's the biggest privacy breach in our time, and it's legal and no one knows it's going on," said Robert Mather, who runs a small employment background company named Pre-Employ.com. "It's like a secret CIA."

Despite all the information Americans now share on social media and websites, and all the data we know companies collect on us, one piece of information is still sacred to most people: their salaries. After all, who would post their salary as a status update on Facebook or in a tweet?

But salary information is also for sale by Equifax through The Work Number. Its database is so detailed that it contains week-by-week paystub information dating back years for many individuals, as well as other kinds of human resources-related information, such as health care provider, whether someone has dental insurance and if they've ever filed an unemployment claim. In 2009, Equifax said the data covered 30 percent of the U.S. working population, and it now says The Work Number is adding 12 million records annually.

How does Equifax obtain this sensitive and secret information? With the willing aid of thousands of U.S. businesses, including many of the Fortune 500. Government agencies -- representing 85 percent of the federal civilian population, including workers at the Department of Defense, according to Equifax -- and schools also work with The Work Number. Many of them let Equifax tap directly into their data so the credit bureau can always have the latest employment information. In fact, these organizations actually pay Equifax for the privilege of giving away their employees' personal information.

Equifax turns around and sells some of this data to third parties, including debt collectors and other financial services companies. 

Equifax declined to be interviewed, but in an emailed statement to NBCNews.com, it confirmed that it shares "employment data" with debt collectors and others, and said it does so in compliance with Fair Credit Reporting Act guidelines. 

"In all cases, these entities must have a permissible purpose to request employment information," Equifax spokesman Timothy Klein said. 

He also said consumers give these third parties the right to access the data "at the time of application" for credit.

"A consumer grants verifiers (creditors) and their assigned debt collectors the right to verify employment should the consumer default on their account," he said. "


rest at http://redtape.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/01/30/16762661-exclusive-your-employer-may-share-your-salary-and-equifax-might-sell-that-data

Confronted By Reporter, @speakerBoehner Can’t Explain Why Revenue He Once Agreed To Is Now Off The Table

source http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/06/1549701/boehner-cant-explain-revenue/

Since the deal to avert the so-called "fiscal cliff" was signed, Republicans have tried to portray it as "the last word" on taxes, since the deal included $600 billion in revenue. But last year, Speaker of the House John Boehner (R-OH) reportedly agreed to a deal that included $1 trillion in revenue. When asked by a reporter during a press briefing today why that total is now off the table, Boehner had no answer other than blaming President Obama:

Q: You said that President Obama quote "got his revenues, has his revenues." But during December you offered $1 trillion in revenue, the fiscal cliff deal got $600 billion. If Obama took your offer, your last offer, $1 trillion for $1 trillion, could that pass the House?

BOEHNER: Who knows what would happen today? The fact is that the $1 trillion in spending cuts and reforms that were on the table, the president never agreed to. And the $1 trillion I put on the table wasn't enough for the president.

Watch it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=lWPrAxiWnjw

However, the deficit reduction achieved since 2011 has still overwhelmingly favored spending cuts to tax increases, meaning that any budget deal going forward should include new revenue in order to be truly balanced. As the Congressional Budget Office reported yesterday, the country's projected deficits have improved substantially over the last few years, while the debt is all but stabilized. The far bigger problem is that tighter fiscal policy from Washington is stifling economic growth.

One House Republican yesterday admitted that he would rather agree to a new increase in revenue than see the so-called "sequester" spending cuts take place on schedule in March.


WATCH: A Republican Whose Nephew Was Killed In Aurora Explains In 80 Seconds Why We Need Stronger Gun Laws

source http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/02/06/1538561/dave-hoover-gun-laws/

If stronger gun laws are passed in the United States following an unthinkable list of tragedies, from Columbine to Blacksburg to Aurora to Newtown, it will be in large part because of support from people like Dave Hoover.

Hoover is a lifelong Republican. He grew up hunting, has owned firearms most of his life, and enjoys taking his daughter out shooting. "We've been given the right to own and bear arms," he told ThinkProgress.

"But," he followed up, "we also need to show that we are responsible in how we deal with the gun issue."

Gun violence is not an abstract concept to Hoover. On July 20, 2012, when James Holmes entered an Aurora theater minutes from Hoover's home and shot 70 people in a matter of minutes, one of those killed was his nephew, 18-year-old AJ Boik.

If anyone knows the awful reality of gun violence it's Dave Hoover. Watch him explain in 80 seconds why we need stronger gun laws:

It's hard to think of a position that's more mainstream than Hoover's. Universal background checks are supported by 91 percent of Americans and 92 percent of Republicans. One of the only groups that publicly opposes universal background checks are the NRA's lobbyists.

If Congress succeeds in passing universal background checks and other commonsense gun laws, it will be because it's not a polarizing issue, but one that's nearly universally supported.

Transcript below the fold:

HOOVER: We've had so many issues over the years, so many killings, and for us just to say we're not going to do anything is unacceptable, because we've been doing nothing up to this point. We've been given the right to own and bear arms, but we also need to show that we are responsible in how we deal with the gun issue. We need a framework to say that we need background checks on every individual that buys a gun. If you are a reasonable and responsible gun owner—as I am, and I've grown up hunting, shooting, my daughter, I take her out shooting—she's been taught that with the right comes responsibility. Nobody wants somebody to purchase a firearm that shouldn't have a firearm. And that includes sales that happen currently on the Internet, and private sales. It's just responsible. This is not something about [Republican and Democrat], this is about doing what's responsible and right for our communities and our country. If anybody can be prevented from getting that phone call that I got at 2:37am from my sister, it's worth it. You gotta stop this.


Koch-kissing, ALEC-loving PA Gov.Tom Corbett To PA Uninsured: Sorry, Your Health Isn't Worth It

source http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/corbett-pa-uninsured-sorry-your-healt

Koch-kissing, ALEC-loving PA Gov.Tom Corbett had the advantage of a weak opponent and that "vote for me, I was a prosecutor who was tough on crime!" routine the first time he ran for governor. But he's pissed off just about everyone since then by following in the wing-nuttiest footsteps of Wisconsin's Gov. Scott Walker.

Just like Scott Walker, Gov. Corbett will be getting much closer scrutiny. The newly-elected Attorney General Kathleen Kane has appointed a special prosecutor to look into how Corbett handled (or mishandled) the investigation of Jerry Sandusky, and I suspect that will rough him up when he runs for reelection. We're going to have to work hard to defeat this jackass, who just turned down the Medicaid expansion offered by the Affordable Care Act.

In the meantime, if you're a PA resident, call the Governor's office at 800-515-8134. (or email him) and ask him what you're expected to do without affordable insurance. Call your state senator and state representative, too:



rest at http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/corbett-pa-uninsured-sorry-your-healt

Gun Shop Owner Protests Obama’s Gun Proposals By Giving Away 1,000 Rounds Of Ammo

source http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2013/02/06/1549871/gun-giveaway-pennsylvania/

Transcripts Show Corrupt Traders Planning To Rig Global Financial Markets: ‘It’s A Cartel Now In London’ - U.S. media ignores it

source http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/06/1548911/transcripts-libor-rigging/

The Royal Bank of Scotland will have to pay more than $600 million to U.S. and UK regulators for its role in rigging the LIBOR interest rate. RBS is one of several banks that rigged LIBOR in order to make huge profits, as regulators looked the other way.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission today released transcripts of electronic conversations between RBS traders and their clients that reveal just how explicit they were about rigging the rate in order to boost their respective bottom lines. Here are some of the highlights:

Yen Trader 1: where would you like it[,] libor that is[,] same as yesterday is call

Yen Trader 4: haha, glad you clarified ! mixed feelings but mostly I'd like it all lower so the world starts to make a little more sense.

Senior Yen Trader: the whole HF [hedge fund] world will be kissing you instead of calling me if libor move lower

Yen Trader 1: ok, i will move the curve down[,] 1bp[,] maybe more[,] if I can

——————

Senior Yen Trader: its just amazing how libor fixing can make you that much money

[…]

Senior Yen Trader: its a cartel now in london[.] they smack all the 1yr irs ..and fix it very high or low

——————

Yen Manager: for choice we want lower libors…let the [Money Market] guys know pls

Yen Trader 2: sure i am setting today as [Yen Trader 1] and cash guy off [Primary Submitter]

Yen Manager: great set it nice and low

——————-

Swiss Franc Trader: can u put 6m swiss libor in low pls?

Primary Submitter: NO

Swiss Franc Trader: should have pushed the door harder

Primary Submitter: Whats it worth

Swiss Franc Trader: ive got some sushi rolls from yesterday?

[…]

Primary Submitter: ok low 6m , just for u

Swiss Franc Trader: wooooooohooooooo[,] 0.01%? thatd be awesome

Primary Submitter: 1.33

Swiss Franc Trader: perfect[.] u r a nice man

These emails are right in line with those uncovered at other banks that were rigging LIBOR. This rigging may have cost U.S. taxpayers billions of dollars, but by and large, U.S. media have ignored it.


Dick Morris, 'The Worst Pundit of 2012'

source http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/02/dick-morris-the-worst-pundit-of-156255.html

With Dick Morris out at Fox News, it's worth taking a look at the old pollster's track record.

Morris, who predicted until the end that Mitt Romney would win in a landslide, was the punch line of the 2012 presidential election. Slate's Dave Weigel posits that "no single human made as many wrong, botched, bogus, and stupid predictions about the 2012 election as Dick Morris."

Harsh as it sounds, there's actually some hard evidence to back that up. PunditTracker, a website dedicated to bringing "accountability to the prediction industry," rated Morris "The Worst Pundit of 2012."

PunditTracker has graded 30 predictions made by Morris, six of which were correct, giving him a 20 percent hit rate. Among the highlights, Morris predicted that Romney would get 325 electoral votes, win the national election by 4 to 8 percentage points, win Michigan, win Pennsylvania, win Nevada, win Wisconsin, win New Hampshire, and win Ohio. He also predicted that Republicans would retake the Senate. (Morris offered a mea culpa after the election: "I called it as I saw it from the polling, and I did the best I could... and at the time that I said it, I believe I was right," he said.)

PunditTracker figures that "if you bet $1 on each of Morris' calls in a virtual political betting market, you would have lost 70% of your money."

Morris's future in punditry is uncertain. He'll be on CNN with Piers Morgan tonight, though that's hardly a harbinger of future prospects.

But it's not all bad. There was a time in human history when fortune tellers met worse fates for getting it wrong.


rest http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/02/dick-morris-the-worst-pundit-of-156255.html

Poachers kill 11,000 Gabon elephants in under a decade

source http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/feb/06/poachers-kill-gabon-elephants

Poaching elephants in Minkebe National Park, Gabon
An estimated 11,100 elephants have been killed since 2004 in the Minkebe national park alone. Photograph: WWF

Poachers have killed more than 11,000 elephants in Gabon's Minkebe national park rainforest since 2004, Gabon's government said on Wednesday, with the massacre fuelled by increasing demand for ivory in Asia.

The densely forested central African country is home to about half the world's roughly 100,000 remaining forest elephants, the smallest species of elephant and coveted by ivory dealers for their harder and straighter tusks.

A study conducted by Gabon's government along with advocacy groups WWF and the Wildlife Conservation Society found two-thirds of the forest elephants in Minkebe park had been killed off since 2004, or about 11,100.

"If we don't reverse this situation rapidly, the future of elephants in Africa will be compromised," Lee White, executive secretary of Gabon's national parks agency, said in a statement issued by Gabon's presidency.

Demand for ivory for use in jewellery and ornamental items is rising fast in Asia. Conservationists say growing Chinese influence and investment in Africa has opened the door wider for the illicit trade in elephant tusks.

Poachers are often armed with large-calibre rifles and chainsaws to remove tusks, the statement issued by the presidency said. They have secret camps in the rainforest, evading small deployments of park guards and leaving rotting elephant carcasses in their wake.


rest http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2013/feb/06/poachers-kill-gabon-elephants

.@gop I saw this last night and thought it was great: Jon Stewart exposes how GOP manipulates their message to fool voters

source http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/02/06/1185000/-MUST-SEE-Jon-Stewart-exposes-how-GOP-manipulates-their-message-to-fool-voters


Last night, Jon Stewart looked at the Republican messaging coming from Frank Luntz, and on some of the other ideas to get Republicans to win elections.

How did Republicans lose this eminently winnable presidential race?
AMY KREMER, TEA PARTY EXPRESS CHAIRWOMAN (1/25/2013): The Republican Party has a serious messaging problem.

REP. JUSTIN AMASH, R-MI (1/22/2013): I think our messaging has not been very strong.

LAURA INGRAHAM (12/26/2012): The messaging was bad.

Messaging!  If only people knew what the Republicans were about.  What the Republicans need is some kind of 24-hour a day, 7-day a week, perpetual messaging refinement and distribution resource.  Preferably one cloaked in the trappings of journalistic authority, but without any of its ethical constraints.  What would we call such a place?  Elephant News is too obvious.  Insane Clown Posse is already taken.  Ferret!  Ferret News!

....

Frank Luntz!  Republican Batman.  The famed Republican spin doctor credited with such masterful messaging coups as calling relaxed pollution standards the "Clear Skies Act"'; calling the estate tax the "death tax"; and making universal health care coverage sound like a shit sandwich.

8/14/2009:

FRANK LUNTZ: The language that you used before, you're calling it a public option, which is what the White House calls it.  Are you sure it isn't a "government option"? ... If you called it the "government option", the public is overwhelmingly against it.

SEAN HANNITY: You know what?  It's a great point, and from now on, I'm going to call it the government option.

"Hey, thanks a lot, Frank.  I'm going to call health care, I'm gonna call it the government option, because I don't want people to have health care.  Thank you, thank you.  I appreciate you telling me how to fuck everybody over.  Thanks a lot."

And while that type of Orwellian sleight of tongue has traditionally been performed in a more catacombs-like environment, or underneath a volcano, the good people at Ferret News believe in transparency.  So let's fix that messaging.

....

1/14/2013:

GRETCHEN CARLSON: You believe the error is "smaller government".  The adjustment should be "more effective and efficient government".  Why are those words so much more important?

FRANK LUNTZ: Because the American people don't care what the size of government is.

"You see, Gretchen, if you say you want smaller government, the electorate rejects it.  But if you say you want the government to function more efficiently, the electorate likes it, even though that's clearly not what you believe.  It's the power of language!  It's why this is called a beard, and not a chin-faking face pube."  (shocked audience laughter)  I like this game!  Let's play....  Well, first of all, to be fair, it would be curlier. Let's play more error and adjustment!

rest at http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/02/06/1185000/-MUST-SEE-Jon-Stewart-exposes-how-GOP-manipulates-their-message-to-fool-voters

Thanks To Congressional Incompetence, Saturday Mail Delivery Is History

source http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/02/06/1547551/postal-service-saturday-delivery/

.@foxnews Fox Decides "The Polar Bears Are Doing Just Fine" even though data indicates otherwise

source http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/02/05/fox-decides-the-polar-bears-are-doing-just-fine/192538

"In fact, the polar bears located in the region that Unger lived in are one of 8 subpopulations in decline, according to a comprehensive review conducted in 2009. The following graphic illustrates the 19 distinct subpopulations of polar bears, only one of which is thought to be increasing:

Source: Polar Bear Specialist Group

While polar bear populations have increased since the 1970s thanks to conservation efforts, climate change could threaten "the survival of polar bears as a species," according to a 2004 assessment. And the U.S. Geological Survey projected in 2007 that changes in Arctic ice conditions could result in "loss of approximately 2/3 of the world's current polar bear population by the mid 21st century."