Wednesday, June 12, 2013

WHAT ASSHOLE: Wisconsin Senate Majority Leader Loses It While Ramming Through Vaginal Ultrasound Bill

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/06/12/1215753/-VIDEO-Wisconsin-Senate-Majority-Leader-Loses-It-While-Ramming-Through-Vaginal-Ultrasound-Bill#

There isn't a lot of background needed on this. Wisconsin's Republican majority continued their self-proclaimed "laser focus" on jobs this morning by passing a bill forcing women seeking abortions to undergo an invasive vaginal ultrasound first - for "educational" purposes.

The ghouls promoting this state-sanctioned-rape bill decided they didn't have time for debate this morning, so watch what happened...

 http://youtu.be/2iRmaT9KIl4

Here is a portion of what Democratic State Senator Mark Miller had to say about this morning's events:

"Senate Majority Leader Fitzgerald, Senate President Ellis, and the Republican Senate majority conspired not only to limit debate, but also to violate Senate rules of procedure by suspending the rules without obtaining the super-majority consent required. The bill was referred to the Assembly in violation of Senate rules...."
Here is the reaction of State Senator Fred Risser, the longest-serving state legislator in American history:
I've been in the Legislature over 50 years, through different majorities and different minorities, and I have never experienced the abuse of power by the majority party that I experienced today.

The arrogance shown by the Republican Majority today is unprecedented. This is
supposed to be a democracy. The Senate is supposed to be a place where the elected
representatives of the citizens of the state debate issues. Cutting off debate, preventing female Senators from talking about women's issues, is not how we do things in Wisconsin and I am disgusted.

The Republican Majority is afraid. They were afraid that they would lose some of their
own members who were less than enthusiastic about the measure. They were afraid that they were losing the debate publicly so they had to ram the bill though so the public wouldn't find out what they are really up to and who they are beholden to. They're afraid of what's going to happen in the next election and they should be afraid.

Witnesses in the gallery reported that Majority Leader Mike Ellis, the man you see in the video, actually broke his gavel while pounding away and screaming at duly elected officials, ordering them to sit down and shut up.

REST http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/06/12/1215753/-VIDEO-Wisconsin-Senate-Majority-Leader-Loses-It-While-Ramming-Through-Vaginal-Ultrasound-Bill#

Sunday, June 9, 2013

Dem Elijah Cummings releases the transcript of a Republican IRS manager saying the White House had nothing to do with the scandal @DarrellIssa

http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/elijah_cummings_outplays_darrell_issa/

Elijah Cummings outplays Darrell IssaRanking Democrat Elijah Cummings of Maryland and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman Darrell Issa(Credit: AP)

Elijah Cummings wastes no time.

Just hours after the vice chair of the House Oversight Committee threatened Chairman Darrell Issa with releasing House Oversight Committee interview transcripts that clear the White House of wrongdoing in the IRS mess on CNN, AP already has the story: "a self-described 'conservative Republican' has told investigators that no one at the White House directed the Internal Revenue Service to target tea party groups."

The Maryland Democrat released a transcript Sunday of the committee investigators' interview with a manager of the IRS' Cincinnati office. The unidentified man told investigators that workers in that office instigated the reviews on their own, that he was unaware of a political motivation behind the extra scrutiny to conservative groups' applying for tax-exempt status, and that there was no evidence of any White House involvement.

You'll recall that a week ago, Issa told CNN's Candy Crowley that IRS agents "were directly being ordered from Washington," but he offered no proof, though he hinted of dark secrets his investigators had learned in their interviews with IRS staff. This Sunday, Cummings told Crowley he "begged" Issa to release the full transcripts – and promised her "If he does not release them, I will. Period…I'll release them by the end of the week." He didn't wait that long.

While Issa had acknowledged that at least one staffer told investigators he didn't see evidence of White House involvement, the full interview was more emphatic, Cummings said.

"He was a 21-year veteran," Cummings told Crowley. "He described himself in the interviews in response to a Republican attorney's question as a conservative Republican. Very significant. He is a conservative Republican working for the IRS. I think these interviews and these statements go a long way to showing the White House was not involved in this."

"Based upon everything I've seen, the case is solved. And if it were me, I would wrap this case up and move on."

Issa is unlikely to wrap up and move on, but Cummings showed he's not going to be a potted plant in the meantime. Nicely played, Mr. Vice-Chairman.


NSA has been collecting phone call data sine 2006 under Bush in case @gop & @foxnews forgot

source https://www.facebook.com/beingliberal.org


from CNN: Edward Snowden was source who leaked material from the National Security Agency per the Guardian


From: CNN Breaking News <BreakingNews@mail.cnn.com>
Date: Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 2:13 PM
Subject: CNN Breaking News
To: textbreakingnews2@ema3lsv06.turner.com


The Guardian newspaper has named Edward Snowden, 29, as the source who leaked material from the National Security Agency.

His identity is being revealed at his request, the paper reported Sunday on its website.

He is a former technical assistant for the CIA and has been working at the NSA for the past four years as an employee of various outside contractors, the paper reported.

On Wednesday, the Guardian disclosed a secret order from a U.S. intelligence court that required Verizon Business Network Services to give telephone records detailing the time, location and telephone numbers involved in domestic calls from April 25 to July 19.

Thursday, the Washington Post and the Guardian disclosed the existence of PRISM, reporting that the program allows NSA analysts to extract details of customer activities -- including "audio and video chats, photographs, e-mails, documents" and other materials -- from computers at Microsoft, Google, Apple and other Internet firms.

Follow complete coverage of breaking news on CNN TV, http://cnn.com and CNN Mobile.

*****************************************
Something new is brewing in the morning.
New Day on CNN.
Starts Monday, June 17 on CNN
Weekday Mornings 6-9am ET
CNN.com/NewDay
*****************************************



Saturday, June 8, 2013

@reppaulryan Paul Ryan & 16 Other Hypocritial Republicans Caught Begging For Obamacare Funds

from http://occupydemocrats.com/paul-ryan-16-other-hypocritial-republicans-caught-begging-for-obamacare-funds/

You won't believe what The Nation magazine obtained through a Freedom of Information Act Inquiry: a list of 17 Republicans who secretly pursued Obamacare's medicaid expansion dollars while hypocritically slamming the law in public, as well as all of their letters begging for the funds from the big, bad federal government.

Every single one of the Republican congresspeople listed below, including master hypocrite Paul Ryan, have voted over 30 times to repeal the law while privately begging for its funding from the federal government.

The Nation calls this behavior "shameless hypocrisy" as well as evidence "of the fact that the Affordable Care Act bestows tangible benefits that even congresses most extreme right wing ideologues are hard-pressed to deny to their constituents".

While Tea Party Republicans literally believe "Obamacare" to be socialist Armageddon, some of their favorite representatives are making it clear that they are aware of the reality that the Affordable Care Act is a much-needed reform that will improve the life of millions of Americans, including their own constituents.

Why the corporate dominated mainstream media is likely to ignore this story, it is up to us to make some noise about the incredible hypocrisy of these Republican Congress people that publicly denounced a wonderful reform and then turn around and beg for money for its implementation.

Please do your part by sharing this and other related articles on social media forums.

Read all of their hypocritical letters here.

Senators
Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-TX)
Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)
Senator Thad Cochran (R-MS)
Senator John Cornyn (R-TX)
Senator Mark Kirk (R-IL)
Senator Rob Portman (R-OH)

Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT, recently joined conservative AEI)

Congress members:
Rep Mary Bono Mack (R-CA)
Rep Jerry Lewis (R-CA)
Rep. David Valadao (R-CA)
Rep John Barrow (R-GA)
Rep Johnny Isakson (R-GA)
Rep Gregg Harper (R-MS)
Rep Lee Terry (R-NE)
Rep Steve Pearce (R-NM)
Rep Bob Gibbs (R-OH)
Rep Kirsti Noem (R-SD)
Rep Michael McCaul (R-TX)
Rep Paul Ryan (R-WI) – his letter here


A conservative's story of why she left the Republican Party

from http://thebigslice.org/why-i-am-no-longer-a-republican/

When I began writing this I was overwhelmed with the desire to hit something…or vomit. Over the coming weeks that desire has lessened to a slow simmer of absolute disgust and dismay at what has become of the party that I used to love and support. I was once a Republican living in a red state. Today I'm a registered Democrat living in a blue state. This is my story and why I left the Republican Party.

It all started in 2007. I was a 27 year-old divorced woman with no children. I was a survivor of severe domestic abuse. I was single with no money, no home and no plan other than to try and be something more than what I was. I had a car, my clothes and hope.

After moving to a new state with the help of friends, I found a very cheap apartment in a part of town that I still cringe over. My 2 jobs at minimum wage didn't bring home enough for luxuries like choosing where to live and what to eat. There were days that I had to decide whether I was going to put gas in my car so I could get to work or eat. I always chose work. At least at one of my jobs I would get breakfast and lunch 2 days a week. I could make a $3.99 pizza with 8 slices last for 7 days. I could eat on a can of beans and a pack of crackers for even longer.

I applied to the local university in my town and went back to school while maintaining my two jobs. I took between 15-18 credit hours each semester while working. All of this was possible because of government loans and scholarships.

I went to counseling 2 times a week to work through my PTSD that was caused by the domestic violence I experienced. The church that the counselor worked out of paid for my appointments because I was too poor to pay for them and my counselor said I wouldn't improve mentally without them.

The biggest fear during this time was that I might get physically sick and need to go to the doctor. When you're poor, healthcare is something that you dream about. It's something that you pray you won't need. It's the anxiety of "what if" that keeps you awake at night. I went to work sick. I took finals while running a 104 fever. I ruptured 3 discs in my back and couldn't walk for a week. I wasn't able to get it treated for 3 years. I lost one of my jobs. I found another minimum wage job. It didn't offer health insurance.

Basic healthcare is not a luxury. It is not just for those that "deserve" it. In the country of abundance that we live in, healthcare should be affordable for every citizen. It's reprehensible that I can buy a DVD player for less than what it would cost me to go to the doctor and get an antibiotic. Here in the United States we have some of the best medical technology and doctors in the world. Why do we think that only a few of our citizens should be entitled access to them? Why didn't my Republican party see that? I was left with no answers.

The day I went to sign up for food stamps opened my eyes and changed everything. I had grown up in an upper middle class family. We were traditional, conservative and religious.

I need to break here for a moment and ask that as you read the "religious" part; that you would not confuse it with faith. These are 2 vastly different concepts. What some hold as religion is not the God of the Bible.

My family believed one pulled themselves up by their own bootstraps and never asked for help. It was a family that held firm to a Republican ideology that those on food stamps or "government handouts" were poor, uneducated and lazy individuals that just wanted to stay home and watch tv. These types of people were of the lowest kind. They were to be distrusted and almost hated. However, as I sat in the overcrowded room I looked around and saw people from all walks of life. You could see the desperation on their faces and the worry in every word. "I need help now. What do I do? Please help me." There was something else that was there too…something so tangible it was overwhelming. It was shame. That oppressive shame of having to say, "I can't do this on my own."

I left in tears never returning. My Republican roots and their mantra echoing in my ears…"Lazy, poor, ignorant….Shame!" I told myself I would rather starve.

Throughout this time I had been listening to the candidates' speeches in preparation for the 2008 election. I came from a very politically active family and there hasn't been a single election that I haven't known about and had an "opinion" on (even if it was only given to me by my parents) since I was 8 years-old and my father ran for his first public office as a Republican.

This election was different though. Not just because we potentially had our first African-American candidate, but because we had a candidate that spoke to the people about the everyday issues. We for once had a candidate who said not everyone can pull themselves up without a hand reaching out. I heard words of the civil obligation we have to each other, words of encouragement and of hope.

I went back and listened to every speech I could find that Senator Obama had made. I listened with new ears and a new heart. I was no longer the girl that had lived "easy". I knew what hard was and I wanted a candidate that did too. I reevaluated what my own personal political beliefs were and I knew that I could no longer support the Republican platform.

In 2008 I watched as President Obama was elected. I clapped and shouted with fellow democrats at the headquarters' watch party. It was my first election that I ever voted Democrat in. Everything had changed.

In 2009 I graduated from college with a degree in Political Science and History. I was able to get a better paying job and move into a slightly nicer part of town.

My feelings toward the Republican Party have not changed. They really are no longer Republicans. There are some moderates left, but the narrow, fear mongering voice of the party that has taken over drowns out all of those that speak truth. They have traded in a Christian belief of loving your neighbor for one that champions big business, the wealthy, and those that have no idea what struggle looks like.

Over the past few months alone we have seen how far gone the Republicans really are. 160 voted against The Violence Against Women's Act. My party that I once loved deserted me. Not just as a woman, but as a citizen of this country. We even have a Republican, New Hampshire state Rep. Mark Warden saying "Some people like abusive relationships." My response to him;

"I can answer truthfully that no, I didn't like having my jaw broken or the bones in my face shattered. I didn't like being dragged by my hair or strangled. I didn't like the bruises, busted lips or black eyes. I didn't like the mental and physical scars it left me with. And that's why I left with nothing. I didn't like having to choose between my life and my livelihood, even when your party makes it so hard for women to be on their own. I did. Now, can you please walk in my shoes for a while? My feet are awfully tired."

When it comes to food stamps I have seen many of my Republican friends say how it's so great that we have drug tests for food stamps and yet they've never given out food to the homeless or the poor. And they don't care that the testing will cost Florida millions of dollars and thus far has only saved them $60,000. 98% of those tested have passed. It's still the idea that everyone that needs help must be lazy and on drugs. Another lie that the Republicans would have us believe. I'm sure that there are some that fall into that category, but not all. Just like I know that not all Republicans are right-wing, gun-toting, women hating nut jobs…just some of them are.

There's another issue that I've decided to add in here. I debated long and hard on it, but it needs to be talked about. It's the issue of guns. On September 4, 1962 my grandmother was shot and killed with a .45 caliber automatic pistol. It was a gun that was obtained legally from our own US government actually. Because of this I have very strong views on gun control. Yes, I had them even as a Republican. I just kept them to myself back then. I don't care what nationality, race, religion or party affiliation you are. When you believe that your right to own a gun is greater than another human being's right to live, you have serious problems. I am at a loss for words as to how the very same people who wear the name of Christian are also the loudest opponents of gun control. "Jesus loves you, but please don't take this deadly weapon from me."

My grandmother was a model and an artist. She left behind 3 small children. One of them was my mother. How different her life would have been if our country had strong gun control laws.

People love to ask me, "How could you ever be a Democrat?" My response is always the same; "Because I know what it's like to not be a corporation that has the ear of a well-connected Senator. I know what it feels like to not have a lobbyist organization to speak for me. I know what it's like to be a second class citizen in a country that claims to protect the weak. I have been the woman in need of food stamps, the woman that the Violence Against Women's Act protects. Obamacare was written for me and the millions of others just like me. I went to school on government 'handouts.' I want to live in a nation that values life above the cost of a bullet."

My friends, I didn't leave the Republican Party. They abandoned me years ago.


@realdonaldtrump Donald Trump Blames Crime On Blacks, Hispanics - yet no mention of white collar crime

from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/05/donald-trump-blames-crime_n_3392535.html?ir=Latino%20Voices&utm_campaign=060613&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Alert-latino-voices&utm_content=Title

Donald Trump shared his thoughts on race and crime on Twitter Wednesday, foisting the blame for violence in the United States on blacks and Latinos.


Donald J. Trump
According to Bill O'Reilly, 80% of all the shootings in New York City are blacks-if you add Hispanics, that figure goes to 98%. 1% white.

The statistics that Fox pundit Bill O'Reilly cited appear to come from the 2012 New York City Enforcement Report compiled by the police department. The report says that of the 662 shooting suspects for which a race or ethnicity was known, 78.2 percent were black, while 18.9 percent were Hispanic and 2.4 percent were white.

Though national figures crime are far less skewed, Trump went on to tweet that the "overwhelming amount of violent crime in our major cities is committed by blacks and [H]ispanics" and invited his Twitter followers to discuss the "tough subject."


Donald J. Trump
Sadly, the overwhelming amount of violent crime in our major cities is committed by blacks and hispanics-a tough subject-must be discussed.

Many serious analysts other than Trump spend their lives analyzing the links between race, ethnicity and crime, often concluding that socioeconomic inequality plays a strong role. Sociologist Robert Sampson and criminologist Janet Lauritsen, for example, wrote in a 1997 study:

Race and ethnic disparities in violent offending and victimization are pronounced and long-standing. Blacks, and to a lesser extent Hispanics, suffer much higher rates of robbery and homicide victimization than do whites… These differences result in part from social forces that ecologically concentrate race with poverty and other social dislocations.

Media critic Eric Deggans dismissed the rightwing real estate mogul's musings in a column at the Tampa Bay Times and wondered how far Trump had to go without prompting a reaction from NBC.

"There is no doubt that violent crime is a serious problem in communities of color," Deggans wrote. "But connecting it to race in such a blunt and unfair fashion seems more about blaming certain kinds of people than solving the problem. As always, it remains puzzling that NBC continues to offer a platform to someone so willing to pass along prejudice disguised as political speech," Media Critic Eric Deggans wrote at the Tampa Bay Times.


Friday, June 7, 2013

walmart keeps costs down ny letting taxpayers foot the bill for much of its employees' basic needs

http://host.madison.com/ct/news/local/writers/pat_schneider/report-wal-mart-costs-taxpayers-million-in-worker-saftey-net/article_3dc8dbd5-8f28-5f47-bf35-0f3db2e2ead2.html

Wal-Mart keeps wages and benefits low, relying on taxpayers to foot the bill for basic needs for its workers, according to a new study that used Wisconsin data to draw its conclusions. Assistance programs for Wal-Mart workers can run $904,542 to $1.74 million a year for each of the retail giant's 75 super stores in Wisconsin, the congressional staff report found.

The report — which used Wisconsin data because of the state's superior records on Medicaid participation — calculated the cost of a range of benefits programs, from health care to food stamps and housing subsidies and more for the number of workers likely to be eligible at a typical super store. 

Huffington Post was on top of the release of the report just before the Memorial Day weekend, noting its Democrat authors assumed that someone receiving BadgerCare would apply and receive other benefits.

The report drew criticism from Forbes as a vehicle for lobbying for initiatives to raise the minimum wage and make collective bargaining easier. But even that skeptical look took note of the report's "important" observation that the last 10 years have been a "lost decade" for working families, as their wages fell  to the lowest share of GDP on record and corporate profits rose to their greatest share. 

The report, "Wal-Mart's The Low‐Wage Drag on Our Economy," drew renewed attention this week, with Mother Jones publishing a post Thursday noting that as the country's largest low-wage employer, Wal-Mart's policies are a driving force in keeping wages low. The company also epitomizes the economic divide in America, the magazine said, with the collective wealth of the six owning Waltons equaling the wealth of 48.8 million families on the other end of the spectrum.

Other publications are taking a look at the report. The Los Angeles Times reported Thursday on the social impact of Wal-Mart's low-wage strategy. It noted that a similar 2004 report put the safety net cost to taxpayers at $420,750 per Wal-Mart store, and that California is anticipating an even bigger impact in the future as the federal health care package expands. Legislators in that state are calling for a $6,000 fine to companies for every full-time worker who ends up on its Medicaid program.

Wal-Mart calls the congressional report inaccurate and based on unrealistic scenarios. A spokesperson told HuffPo that in response to criticism of its labor practices, the company has launched a campaign on its "unlimited" employment opportunities.

The debate over the corporation's role in the economy is taking place as protesters travel to Bentonville, Arkansas to picket company headquarters during Friday's stockholders' meeting, reports the Nation. The magazine also provides a guide to the billionaires who run the store.

Meanwhile, a Massachusetts woman who works for the company told HuffPo that she earns $11.70 an hour and receives public assistance, food stamps, Section 8 housing, and state-funded health care. "Wal-Mart doesn't pay my salary," she said. "You pay my salary."


.@WholeFoods is this true?! Whole Foods Allegedly Suspends Two Employees For Speaking Spanish

http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/whole-foods-allegedly-suspends-two-employees-speaking-spanish?utm_source=OV+Newsletter+List+2&utm_campaign=52b9ce4633-OV_Daily_Newsletter6_7_2013&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_5f6757bd76-52b9ce4633-10859405

Whole Foods allegedly suspended two workers at one of its New Mexico locations for speaking Spanish to each other while on the job.

Bryan Baldizan said he and a female employee were suspended for a day after their manager told them Spanish was not allowed during work hours.

"I couldn't believe it," Baldizan said. "All we did was say we didn't believe the policy was fair. We only talk Spanish to each other about personal stuff, not work."

Ben Friedland, who is the Whole Foods Market Rocky Mountain Region executive marketing coordinator, said the company believes in "having a uniform form of communication" to promote a safe working environment, NBC Latino reported.

"Therefore, our policy states that all English speaking team members must speak English to customers and other team members while on the clock," Friedland said. "Team members are free to speak any language they would like during their breaks, meal periods and before and after work."

Advocacy group, ProgressNow New Mexico, said it is organizing a boycott of Whole Foods. An online petition circulated by the group on Thursday collected more than 500 signatures of people who say they will not shop at Whole Foods until it changes its language policy.

"We want Whole Foods to rescind its English-only policy," said Pat Davis, executive director of ProgressNow New Mexico. "We don't think it's appropriate in a state as diverse as New Mexico."

According to Whole Foods spokesperson Libba Letton, the employees were suspended for "rude and disrespectful behavior," and the disciplinary measure had nothing to do with what language they were speaking.

"Due to their rude and disrespectful behavior both in an office and in the store in front of customers, they were suspended with pay," Letton said of the employees. "Their suspension was due to their behavior alone."

Sources: NBC Latino, USA Today 


Thursday, June 6, 2013

26 Million Veterans data breached by eight state sponsored organizations

here http://thehackernews.com/2013/06/26-million-veterans-data-breached-by_5.html

NSA collecting phone records of millions of US citizens daily

here http://thehackernews.com/2013/06/NSA-phone-number-records-surveillance-system-verizon_5.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TheHackersNews+%28The+Hackers+News+-+Security+Blog%29&_m=3n.009a.237.mo0aof3ygb.5aa

Obama administration defends massive phone record collection

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/06/us-usa-wiretaps-verizon-idUSBRE95502920130606?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews

(Reuters) - The Obama administration on Thursday defended its collection of a massive amount of telephone records from at least one carrier as part of U.S. counterterrorism efforts, re-igniting a debate over privacy even as it called the practice critical to protecting Americans from attacks.

The admission came after Britain's Guardian newspaper published on Wednesday a secret court order related to the records of millions of Verizon Communications customers. The surveillance appears to have involved the phone records of millions of Americans.

Privacy advocates blasted the order as unconstitutional government surveillance and called for a review.

A senior administration official, speaking on condition of anonymity, did not specifically confirm the report, but noted the published court order pertains only to data such as a telephone number or the length of a call, and not the subscribers' identities or the content of the telephone calls.

The order requires the government to turn over to the National Security Agency so-called "metadata" such as a list of numbers that called other U.S. or international numbers as well as other transactional information on the time and location of calls. The NSA is the main U.S. intelligence-gathering agency tasked with monitoring electronic communications.

"Information of the sort described in the Guardian article has been a critical tool in protecting the nation from terrorist threats to the United States, as it allows counterterrorism personnel to discover whether known or suspected terrorists have been in contact with other persons who may be engaged in terrorist activities, particularly people located inside the United States," the senior administration official said.

The revelation renewed concerns about the intelligence-gathering effort - criticized by human rights and privacy advocates - launched in the wake of the September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States and raised questions about its oversight.

It also drew fresh attention to President Barack Obama's handling of privacy and free speech issues. His administration already is under fire for searching Associated Press journalists' calling records and the emails of a Fox News Channel reporter as part of its inquiries into leaked government information.

Verizon has declined to comment. It remains unclear whether the practice extends to other carriers, though several security experts and at least one U.S. lawmaker said that was likely.

AT&T Inc declined to comment. Representatives for other major carriers, including Sprint Nextel Corp and T-Mobile, could not be immediately reached or had no immediate comment.

BOSTON BOMBING

The three-month court order, dated April 25, directs Verizon's Business Network Services Inc and Verizon Business Services units to hand over daily electronic data until July 19.



rest http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/06/us-usa-wiretaps-verizon-idUSBRE95502920130606?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews

Congress Approval Poll Shows Only 6 Percent Rate Lawmakers Good Or Excellent

here http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/05/congress-approval_n_3390566.html

Pelosi: Congress is "rigged" to suppress the interests of women and keep their voices out of the discussion

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/05/nancy-pelosi-congress-rigged_n_3391936.html?ir=Politics&utm_campaign=060613&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Alert-politics&utm_content=Title

The day after Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.) and an all-male panel of his colleagues advanced a bill to restrict abortion rights across the U.S., House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Congress is "rigged" to suppress the interests of women and keep their voices out of the discussion.

"This is an environment that is almost rigged, intentionally or not, wittingly or not, rigged so that the status quo just goes on," Pelosi told The Huffington Post in an interview. "We have to kick open the door and make our own environment, reduce the role of money [in campaigns], insist on the civility of debates, and bring more women here, and that's a better reflection of our country."

Pelosi said that as a mother of five children, it infuriates her to see an all-male subcommittee pushing a bill to restrict women's reproductive rights. "What right -- I mean, really, I guess they're elected, they have a committee, they write a bill, but by what moral authority are they to make such a suggestion?" she said. "It always gets me because I have five children. When I brought my baby home, Alexandra, my oldest was turning six. As a practicing Catholic, I think I have the credentials to talk about this subject. Any of you who've had five children in six years can step up to the plate."

Republicans threatened to shut down the federal government over Planned Parenthood funding in early 2011, and women's reproductive rights have been the subject of contentious political debate ever since. Pelosi said that conflict, and the subsequent fury over the birth control coverage requirement in the Affordable Care Act, has really brought to light something she had noticed in Congress for years.

"For 23 years, I have been saying to people, whatever you think about abortion, [Republicans] are against family planning and contraception. But they never believed it," she said. "The one satisfying thing for me last year was that at last the world could see they would shut down the government rather than fund Planned Parenthood. [I said,] 'Now do you see how extreme they are?'"

Pelosi said when she was a ranking member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, she tried to introduce a bill related to funding for international clinics that would educate people on natural family planning methods. She thought that the issue would be something that Republicans and Democrats could agree on, since it did not involve birth control pills or abortion, but all of the Republicans on her committee opposed it. "They said, 'No we're not for any of that family planning,'" she said. "I said, 'We're talking about natural family -- the rhythm system. How come you don't have 13 kids?'"

Pelosi has seen a fair amount of progress since then. Since she was first elected to Congress in 1987, the number of Democratic women in the House of Representatives has multiplied by five, from 12 women to more than 60, and she broke a glass ceiling when she became the first female speaker. But she said the only way to change old ways of thinking and to make sure that women's issues are fairly represented is to continue bringing more diverse voices into politics.

"It's a tough arena for women," she said. "It's not for the faint of heart. But it's definitely worth it, and it's urgently needed."



rest http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/05/nancy-pelosi-congress-rigged_n_3391936.html?ir=Politics&utm_campaign=060613&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Alert-politics&utm_content=Title