Tuesday, December 6, 2011

How investigators unravelled Europe's biggest-ever fake-medicine scam

This article was taken from the December 2011 issue of Wired magazine. Be the first to read Wired's articles in print before they're posted online, and get your hands on loads of additional content by subscribing online.

Kevin Xu, 35, was waiting nervously at Starbucks in Bangkok's busy Suvarnabhumi Airport when the American arrived, fresh off his flight from Houston. Xu, a Chinese national from Shenzhen, began to get up from his chair but the American had already seen him, and the two men shook hands while Xu's wife, who had travelled to Thailand with him, ventured a small, tight smile.

"I'm happy we could meet with each other," Xu said, one hand rising to check the knot of his tie. Both men were smartly dressed as they sat among the transiting travellers. For Xu and his wife, the meeting in July 2007 had the potential to be life-changing -- though not, as it would turn out, in quite the way either of them had envisaged. After years of working to expand their pharmaceutical business, Pacific Orient International, in mainland China, they were finally poised to break into the world's biggest and most lucrative market for prescription medicines: the United States. But to crack that market they needed help -- help that this relaxed, suntanned man seemed willing to provide.

"It's a great opportunity for both of us," the American said, noting Xu's wife's Swiss watch. Unruffled by his 19-hour flight from Texas, the American's deep voice and firm handshake appeared to be designed to put an anxious business partner at ease.

"So what are your biggest products right now?" the American asked, coming straight to the point. Xu glanced at his wife before answering, his English heavily accented and slightly hesitant. "Casodex," he replied. "Uh... Casodex and Plavix. They in your market in the USA?"

Plavix and Casodex are prescription drugs used to treat heart disease and prostate cancer, respectively. Plavix is licensed by drugs giant Bristol-Myers Squibb and Casodex by AstraZeneca. Plavix retails for around £142 a pack of 30 tablets and Casodex for anything up to £240. But Xu wasn't sourcing his drugs from authorised wholesalers -- his iteration was being manufactured illegally in China.

"Right, yes, United States," replied the American. "And I have some customers that I think I can do volume sales on."

Xu could hardly believe his luck. In his relentless drive to expand his high-margin business -- counterfeiters' profits are often enormous because they haven't had to fund the R&D work undertaken by the pharma companies -- he had already found a way into the European market. But until now, the US had been hard to penetrate. Here, finally, was his chance.

After successfully counterfeiting "lifestyle" drugs such as Viagra and Cialis, Xu had branched out into even more profitable life-saving medications, such as Plavix and Casodex, as well as Tamiflu for avian flu, which brought in profits more than 500 per cent higher than Viagra. These were just three of 29 different fake drugs that Xu told the American he could supply for the US, with the American taking a cut.

Like many counterfeiters--- a 2005 report from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development estimated that the fake-medicine trade is worth $200 billion (£130 billion), two cents in every dollar of global exports -- Xu had gone undetected for a long time. His counterfeit medication was shipped from China to Europe. By sending the patient-information leaflets separately from the drug packets and the tablets themselves, and from different destinations, he was making it nearly impossible for the authorities to track him down.

But not completely impossible. What Xu didn't know was that the US department of Immigration Customs Enforcement (ICE) had been tipped off by the pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly. Xu's was the biggest and most sophisticated such crime that ICE had yet come across. Law-enforcement officials don't know exactly how much money the counterfeiter was making, but estimated it to be in the "millions of dollars". Nevertheless, the true extent of Xu's distribution network was still unknown.

The coffee shop was noisy, but Xu was intently focused on the American as he ordered eight shipments of Plavix, Casodex, Tamiflu and Aricept, a drug for Alzheimer's disease. Xu was excited; his deep-set features relaxed a little. This meeting was going better than he ever imagined. He could, potentially, be making millions of dollars within weeks. He did not know that the quiet American was actually a special agent from ICE, and that some of his colleagues were busy videoing the entire exchange.

In May 2007, two months earlier, a licensed pharmaceutical packager in Britain was repacking a wholesale consignment of Zyprexa, an anti-psychotic used in the treatment of schizophrenia, when he found something odd. The drug had just been purchased by his company, OTC Direct. While he was sorting the packets in a warehouse, he noticed a batch number had been inverted on one of the foil blisters. This was unusual.

The packager rang the manufacturer, Eli Lilly. "Can you have a look at some packaging?" he asked. "I don't like the look of this." Minutes later, Eli Lilly called the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) -- the government agency responsible for oversight of medicines and medical devices -- and warned it of some possible counterfeit medicines in the supply chain.

Mick Deats was the head of enforcement at the MHRA. A round-faced, sturdily built man who looks like the ex-police officer he was, he headed the department that investigated and prosecuted serious breaches of medicines legislation and regulations within the UK. Within minutes of receiving the call from Eli Lilly, Deats had the medicines impounded and taken to two labs for analysis. What happened over the following months was to prove the most significant investigation of his MHRA career.

Lab analysis of the Zyprexa tablets confirmed that they were fake, containing only 55 to 80 per cent of the active ingredient. The analysis showed that there were other unknown impurities. "There is no such thing as a 'good' counterfeit medicine," Deats explains. "The bottom line is that they don't work. A counterfeit medicine could contain 100 per cent of the correct active ingredient, but if it doesn't dissolve within the body at the right rate, it's not going to work."

As soon as the results came in, Deats put out the MRHA's first-ever "Class 1" recall for the fake batch of Zyprexa, ordering pharmacies and health-care staff across the UK to take them off the shelves. For some patients, it was already too late: a Class 1 recall meant that counterfeit medicines had already reached high-street pharmacies, hospitals and care homes across the country.

But mystery still surrounded how the fake drugs entered the country -- and if there were any more batches out there. Investigators thought it likely that the medicines had come from China, but someone much closer to home was, in fact, getting them into the UK supply chain. Over the following months, Deats and his colleagues painstakingly traced the origin of the initial boxes of Zyprexa, following a complex audit trail that led from Ireland via Belgium and Mauritius, all the way to a quiet village north of London.

The MHRA needed to discover quickly how the original packet of Zyprexa got to OTC Direct. The audit trail led to a company called Kemco Pharmaceuticals, which had supplied the antipsychotic. The MHRA arrested and questioned Kemco's owner, a licensed wholesaler named Richard Kemp, who was later charged, but was eventually found not guilty of any wrongdoing.

During the questioning, it became apparent that another company was supplying Kemco. "We got names fairly quickly," recalls Deats. One name in particular stood out: Peter Gillespie, a chartered accountant and pharmaceutical distributor. On May 23, 2007, officers from the MHRA drove to Bovingdon, Hertfordshire, in search of Gillespie. The address they were given led them to a gated property, where they met a security guard who turned them away.

Gillespie looked younger than his 64 years. It seemed he was used to exotic holidays, and he had properties across the globe. He could be anywhere -- but he wasn't in Hertfordshire. "He was lying low and he wasn't going to come in until he was ready," Deats says.

In the days following the initial discovery of the fake Zyprexa, the MHRA discovered that other counterfeit medications had entered the UK supply chain. Deats and his team started investigating what other products had been supplied by the people who provided the Zyprexa to OTC Direct. Further batches of fake Plavix and Casodex turned up, causing the MRHA to take the unprecedented step of issuing four Class 1 recalls within days during the end of May and June.

"Things were beginning to snowball," Deats says. "This was far and away the worst-known case we'd ever come across. The last thing that would be on people's minds is that this could be a counterfeit medicine," Deats says. "It's such a rare occurrence that for health-care professionals to even register that there might be an issue... is difficult."

So if patients were to die as a result of taking the fake medicines, the deaths were likely to be attributed to the disease rather than to the drugs. Two weeks after the MHRA's failed attempt to arrest him, Gillespie walked into Staines police station in Middlesex and was arrested on suspicion of importing counterfeit medicines. Investigators were relieved to have him in custody, but wanted to know what he'd been doing while on the run.

In January 2011, Croydon Crown Court would hear that Gillespie, who had 25 years' experience in the business, told the MHRA that he didn't know that the drugs were fake -- he claimed that he had been duped by a Swiss friend and supplier, Arnaud Bellavoine. Gillespie said that he and his colleagues had picked up boxes of medicine from a warehouse in Brussels in a hired van, then driven them back to the premises of a company called Consolidated Medical Supplies (CMS). According to Gillespie, he was working in a perfectly legitimate market known as the pharmaceutical parallel trade. This takes advantage of country-to-country variations in drug prices: licensed wholesalers within the European Union are able to buy medicines at a lower price from another country, relabel them to meet local requirements, and sell them in their country or another country at a higher price.

While Gillespie was being questioned, the recalls in the UK had caught the attention of the US agents who were investigating Xu. Investigators made an important discovery: the batch numbers of the fake UK medication were the same as those Xu offered their agent in Bangkok. The Americans called the MHRA. Xu's name meant nothing to Deats, who was making little headway with Gillespie. The Brussels warehouse where Gillespie collected his stock had yielded plenty of boxes of medicine with documentation suggesting they had originated in China. But when Deats talked to OTC and other UK wholesalers, they all said that Gillespie hadn't sold them Chinese materials: his stock had come from France. Something wasn't adding up.

For his part, throughout his trial Gillespie would claim that he was as shocked as the MHRA to discover that the drugs he was trading were fake. He said he was travelling on the M25 in March 2007 when he received a call from a lab technician. "I was being driven," Gillespie, who had lost his licence for drink driving, explained, "but I told them to pull over. I needed to hear what this was about. He [the technician] told me there was no active ingredient. I was terribly anxious... I can't tell you how horrified I was to be involved."

The trial heard that Gillespie claimed a friend, Bernaud Bellavoine, called him in 2006 and asked him to help his son sell pharmaceuticals in the UK. Gillespie agreed, claiming to the MHRA that his understanding with Bellavoine senior was that the medicines Arnaud would supply him with had come from France. "I'd done 15 years of business with Bernaud," Gillespie said at his trial. "I trusted him totally. So [when told the medication was fake] I felt betrayed. You don't normally pass a poisoned chalice to your friend, but that's what it turned out to be."

Deats wondered why, if Gillespie discovered he'd been the victim of fraud, he hadn't told the authorities. It wasn't until May -- two months after Gillespie claimed he learned the drugs from Bellavoine were counterfeit -- that the MHRA received its tip-off from Eli Lilly. By then Gillespie had disappeared.

During questioning, Gillespie stuck to his explanation that he was an innocent businessman importing French medicines from Brussels and relabelling them at the CMS warehouse in Basingstoke. Deats harboured considerable doubts about Gillespie's explanation, which was rooted in French pharmaceutical protocol. In France, each packet of medicine bears a special label called a vignette. When drugs are dispensed by French pharmacies, the patient peels off the vignette, places it on a form and sends it off for reimbursement from the government. When British wholesalers buy French medication on the parallel market, they remove the vignettes and replace the French-language patient information leaflets with English ones before selling them to UK outlets. So, if a British wholesaler such as Peter Gillespie was buying French medicines, he would expect them to have French labels and vignettes -- yet the boxes found in Brussels were labelled in Chinese.

Frustrated by Gillespie's obfuscation, Deats questioned his long-time colleague, Ashley Hunter. Hunter revealed that Gillespie had purchased a vignetting machine for the CMS warehouse, and had hired him to design the French vignettes. Hunter said that Gillespie had then ordered tens of thousands of the vignettes for Zyprexa, Casodex and Plavix from a print shop in northern England.

Hunter said that he had asked Gillespie why, if he was buying French medicines, he was putting vignettes on them if they were intended, as Gillespie claimed, for the UK market. "If I knew they [the medicines] were going to English wholesalers, I would have been concerned, as the French vignetting wouldn't have been needed," Hunter said in court. But Gillespie reassured Hunter that the relabelled packets were intended for the French market. Later, Gillespie claimed that the medicines had had French vignettes on them but, because he was unhappy with their quality, he had produced new versions. When asked later about the Air Singapore labels on the boxes, Gillespie admitted that he knew that the drugs had been imported from east Asia. "That didn't surprise me," he said. "I've been to Cambodia and I knew France had colonies in the East."

After the police and the MHRA's failed attempt to arrest him on May 23, the trial heard, Gillespie said he had tracked Bernaud Bellavoine to Tunisia and, in a call via Skype, asked what was going on.

According to Gillespie, Bellavoine's response was unexpected. "Go to the airport on Saturday. Air tickets will be waiting for you," he told Gillespie, apparently unfazed.

"I'm not fleeing the country!" Gillespie exclaimed.

But a couple of days later, he said, he flew to Geneva. "I arrived about 11.30am and Bernaud met me at the airport," he said. "Then we went in a taxi to visit his son."

According to Gillespie, Arnaud wanted to offer him not an explanation but more medicines. After Gillespie responded in the negative, Arnaud left the restaurant. Gillespie said that Bernaud seemed embarrassed, explaining that his son had an alcohol problem. Gillespie claimed he felt trapped and betrayed. "I came back to England that evening so tired and shocked that I fell asleep on the plane," he said.

At the ICE office in Houston, the investigation, headed by Special Agent Andre Watson, was progressing well. Since Xu's meeting with the undercover agent in Bangkok, the counterfeiter had sent more than eight shipments in return for a total of $167,000. All the samples ICE tested were fake. Now the agents had to lure Xu to the US in order to make an arrest. Xu was too sophisticated an operator to fall for a cheap trick, but the Americans had found a weakness. "During our agent's meeting in Bangkok with Xu, it became clear that Xu's wife was, well, quite materialistic, and she had an interest in luxury goods," Watson recalls with a laugh. "She enquired about the price of diamonds in the US, and our agent told her that if she was in the States she could obtain high-quality diamonds at wholesale prices." After that, it wasn't hard for the agent to persuade Xu and his wife to visit Houston.

When they arrived Xu looked relaxed and comfortable, happy at last to be in the US with an American he now considered to be a friend. During the meeting Xu revealed: "We have a partner in Europe. He's Swiss -- and very, very rich." Minutes later, US agents burst into the room. Xu was arrested and his laptop confiscated. "Computer forensics allowed us to reconstruct his browsing activity and we could see that he was monitoring the MHRA website," Deats says. He was surprised to note that Xu had attempted to avoid detection by carefully screening the MHRA's recall notices: when a specific batch number was recalled, he could order his factory in China to stop using that number for the products it was on.

Croydon Crown Court heard that the MHRA also found logs of chats Xu had had with Arnaud Bellavoine -- Gillespie's claimed supplier in Switzerland -- showing that they were discussing how to bring the fake drugs into the UK. Xu was air-freighting the medicines from China to Singapore, then to Brussels, where Gillespie would pick them up and take them back to the UK by ferry. There were also pictures on the laptop of boxes of Zyprexa ready for shipment, in drums labelled "caramel colouring".

Frustratingly, though, there was no evidence that Xu had had any direct contact with Gillespie, apart from one small clue: Xu had once conducted a Google search on one of Gillespie's companies. Had he been checking out a potential partner? Neither Xu nor Gillespie was telling, but the MHRA was gradually piecing together what Gillespie had been up to during his two-week disappearance. His computer had "gone missing", and when agents eventually forced the doors of the CMS warehouse in Basingstoke they found it empty, apart from a vignetting machine and a conveyor belt. Investigators scoured the place looking for evidence. Finally, they got lucky: "He'd cleaned out all the evidence," Deats says, "but he'd missed three or four vignettes." (See gallery.)

The discovery of the French labels was the breakthrough they needed. At last, a link had been made between Xu's counterfeit products and Gillespie -- and it confirmed that Gillespie was getting the products into the UK market by passing them off as French stock.

Deats was able to piece together which batch numbers Gillespie had been working on. In all, it appeared that he had brought nine shipments of fake drugs into the UK between December 2006 and May 2007, comprising thousands of packets of drugs with a retail value of £4.7 million. Gillespie's profit would have been around £3.3 million.

Around 72,000 packs of fake medicines had entered the UK supply chain, though something like 7,000 of the counterfeit packets were successfully recalled and a further 40,000 were seized by the MHRA.

"If this hadn't come to light, they were planning to bring another three [types of] drugs through," says Deats. Gillespie already had French vignettes printed for Aricept, Keppra and Risperdal. On April 8, 2011, Gillespie was found guilty of conspiring to defraud pharmaceutical wholesalers, pharmacists and the public. He was also convicted of selling or supplying drugs without authorisation and sentenced to eight years. Xu had been found guilty in a US federal court of importing chemically deficient medication, and received a six-and-a-half-year sentence in January 2009.

Gillespie continues to claim that he is a victim of a government conspiracy. "They knew about these counterfeiters all along," he says of the MHRA, "but they never did anything. They allowed the drugs to circulate just to get this one Chinese guy." In the end, though, they needed someone to blame, Gillespie says, "and it ended up being me."

Nayanah Siva is a freelance writer who has been published in The Lancet and Slate. Details of the Bangkok meeting are taken from surveillance videos shot by ICE.




Monday, December 5, 2011

Kevin Hogan - alleged porn star teacher exposed by Fox in Boston - defended by his students @foxnews #p2 #tcot #lgbt

from http://www.irishcentral.com/story/ent/manhattan_diary/kevin-hogan-alleged-porn-star-teacher-exposed-by-fox-in-boston-134898708.html

Fox 25 in Boston created unexpected uproar this week when one of their text book ambush journalism pieces started - strange to say - backfiring mightily.

The station ran a story about a well-regarded Irish American high school English teacher and crew coach called Kevin Hogan.

Hogan is head of the English department at Mystic Valley Regional Charter School in Malden, outside of Boston.

It turns out that before he stated teaching Hogan allegedly made some gay porn movies in his summer vacation as recently as last year.

There was no claim that he was still involved with the porn industry or that he had ever made a film on class time, Fox acknowledged.

But we know what they probably expected: the same old dance of outrage and expulsion. Just assemble the pieces and watch the community erupt, right? They had exposed Hogan's dirty gay porn shame and they must have anticipated the consequences?

What Fox did not anticipate was that the majority Hogan's students (the very people who supposedly matter most in this equation) were appalled by Fox's sensational report and not the unexpected revelation. They value Hogan's skills as a teacher and crew coach and they shrugged off the five alarm news report.

That's something new in American culture. Usually you can expect a South Park style public pillorying. This time it didn't come though. It caught Fox completely off guard too, making them the news story, not Hogan. 

In fact just yesterday Hogan's students started a Facebook page (the grassroots activism of choice for the under 30 set) and took to Twitter to express their distaste for the whole admittedly sensationalist expose.

Then a poll placed on Fox's own website showed that over 80% of the participants agreed with the students sentiments. They took it down after support for Hogan stayed that high.

No one is going to argue that what Hogan did is either wise or ideal, for goodness sake, but many people are arguing that he's entitled to a private life independent of his career.

Why? Because millions of Americans watch porn videos and many, many Americans are willing to star in them. Porn isn't illegal. These were films he'd made in his past. So should we to deny Hogan the opportunity to have more meaningful career now or ever because of his previous unwise decision?

Perhaps the man needs to be judged on his ability to teach and do his current job, not any previous one.

Friday, December 2, 2011

Chicago taxpayers may need to chip in for White Sox, Bears stadiums @whitesox @ChicagoBearscom


Yesterday, the Chicago News Cooperative reported that the Illinois state fund that's paying off the construction of the White Sox' U.S. Cellular Field and the reconstruction of the Bears' Soldier Field is running short of funds, and will need to be bailed out by city taxpayers. With the hotel tax revenues designated for stadium expenses coming in below projections, the state has withheld $1.1 million in income tax money that would normally go to the city of Chicago.

Today, the News Coop (or as I prefer to think of it after misreading its URL for the umpteenth time, the New Scoop) says that thanks to an "accounting error," the hit to city taxpayers this year was actually only $185,000. That's the good news. The bad is that even if hotel tax revenues rebound, the state sports authority's annual debt payments are scheduled to rise from $30 million to $88.5 million over the next two decades, leading authority board member Jim Reynolds to warn that "the city has to begin to plan for some significant outlays."

rest at http://www.fieldofschemes.com/news/archives/2011/12/4743_chicago_taxpaye.html

@whitesox Taxpayers On Hook for US Cellular and soldier field Stadium Board Shortfall

from http://www.chicagonewscoop.org/city-taxpayers-on-hook-for-shortfall-at-sports-stadium-board/

Taxpayers On Hook for Stadium Board Shortfall
John Konstantaras
Chicago taxpayers have lost more than $1.1 million because of a shortfall in hotel tax dollars dedicated to the Illinois Sports Facility Authority, which runs U.S. Cellular Field and financed the Soldier Field renovation.

Chicago taxpayers have lost more than $1.1 million because of a shortfall in hotel tax dollars dedicated to the city-state agency that runs U.S. Cellular Field and financed the Soldier Field renovation, according to documents obtained this week by the Chicago News Cooperative.

Financial records from the Illinois Sports Facilities Authority show that the state docked City Hall's share of income tax revenue because the hotel tax no longer generates as much as needed. The state fronted $32 million to the agency during the fiscal year that ended on June 30, but the hotel tax revenue "was not adequate to fully repay the advance to the state," according to an independent audit presented last month to agency officials and obtained by the CNC through the state's Freedom of Information Act.

Because the city is responsible for any gap, Chicago received almost $1.11 million less from the state in income tax dollars than it would have been due, the records show. The agency's annual reports indicate that the shortfall marked the first time city taxpayers have been forced to cover such a hole.

The authority was created in 1988 to oversee the construction and operation of the White Sox stadium, and 10 years ago, it also issued almost $400 million in bonds to pay the public share of the $606 million cost for the reconstruction of Soldier Field. At the time, financial experts calculated that revenues from the 2 percent hotel tax would have to grow by an average of 5.5 percent a year over the next three decades to pay off the bonds.

Under the deal, the city would be obligated to cover any shortfalls that arise. Then-Mayor Richard M. Daley brushed aside concerns that robust growth would not be possible in the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, which caused a drop in hotel tax revenues.

"I remain absolutely confident that taxpayers are not at risk for any part of this project," Daley said in late September 2001. "If I had any doubts, I would not proceed."

Agency officials also protested strongly when Fitch Ratings downgraded the bonds in 2009, noting that the hotel tax revenues always had been adequate to cover the debt payments.

But Fitch analysts wrote that debt payments were set to grow, while hotel tax revenues were not rising as fast as anticipated in the past decade.

The first-ever shortfall comes at a time when wholesale leadership changes have roiled the authority's seven-member board.

Gov. Pat Quinn and Mayor Rahm Emanuel have made new appointments to the authority's board of directors, and the mayor has given his assent to Quinn's selection of former Illinois Senate President Emil Jones as the board's new chairman.

The agency's executive director, Perri Irmer, was let go in April, but the selection of a permanent replacement still has not been announced.

Asked about the city's income-tax hit, Emanuel administration spokeswoman Kathleen Strand said in an email: "The mayor just appointed three new members to [the authority board] for their strong financial acumen and has tasked them with identifying what governance and financial reforms are needed to protect taxpayers. The mayor looks forward to working with the new board, as well as the governor and legislature, to ensure [the authority] is put on the right track."

Strand added that mayoral aides had considered the possibility of an authority shortfall that the city would have to cover when they recently crafted a 2012 budget plan to close a projected City Hall deficit of almost $636 million.

Agency officials have "from time to time" considered issuing new bonds and stretching the payoff period, but they never took such action, said James Thompson, who helped create the authority as governor and also served as its chairman and interim executive director until stepping down recently.

"The city wanted to do Soldier Field, and this is the price they are paying," Thompson told the CNC on Tuesday.

Authority spokesman Michael Alvarez declined comment.

The agency has come under criticism recently for building a new restaurant near U.S. Cellular Field and allowing the White Sox to reap the revenues from the stadium amenity.

But Thompson said the authority had no power to force the team to share the revenues from the restaurant. "That's the lease," he said. "It's been true for more than 25 years. We always built the restaurants in the stadium, and the White Sox always got the revenue."

Jones told Crain's Chicago Business last month that he wants to review the terms of the team's lease with the agency, which calls for lower rent payment than other major-league baseball teams owe to governments that are stadium landlords.

Thompson said he agreed that the White Sox received a favorable rent agreement, but he added that the long-term stadium deal was crafted at a time when the team's owners were threatening to leave the South Side to move to Florida.

disappointing. @adamcarolla Adam Carolla Slams Occupy Wall Street, Millennial Generation as 'F---ing Self-Entitled Monsters' #p2 #tcot

from http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/adam-carolla-occupy-wall-street-rant-268741?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thr%2Fbusiness+%28The+Hollywood+Reporter+-+Business%29

The comedian unleashed an expletive laced rant in an interview with the conservative Media Research Center.

Funnyman Adam Carolla wasn't laughing in a recent interview with the conservative organization Media Research Center. In a frank discussion on the current Occupy movements, Carolla went off on a profane rant, slamming the parents of an entire generation.

"I understand that some people have more than others, that's always gonna be there," he began. "There's something that's come up in this country that didn't use to exist, which is envy. And it's a big issue, it was understood back in the day, and we are empowering, we're now dealing with the first wave of participation trophy, my own fecal matter doesn't stink, empowered, I feel so fucking good about myself, everybody's a winner, there's no losers, we are dealing with the first wave of those fucking assholes."

"I call them the ass douches," he added.

Carolla went on to criticize the parents of the millennial generation, accusing them of failing to prepare their children for the harsh realities of adult life.

"We've created a bunch of fucking self-entitled monsters," he said. "'I want my Most Valuable Player trophy.' 'Well, you're the slowest, fattest guy on the team.' Why should he get one and I don't get one?' 'Because he busts his ass and he runs a 4.4 40. That's why he gets one.' 'Well, this is bullshit.' And then everyone gets involved and everyone gives everyone a participation trophy and then everyone feels good about themselves but it's not based on anything."


"You should feel good about yourself because of your accomplishments. Not because somebody yelled at you to feel good about yourself," Carolla continued. "When these folks become adults and enter the workplace, they've done stories on this, on how you can't treat them. The boss can't yell 'Hey, let's go. Let's get back to work.' 'Oh, you've raised your voice to me. You better watch your tone, buddy. My dad's a lawyer, he'll sue your ass, I'll take this company.'"

Circling back to the current Occupy movement, Carolla suggests that the young adults involved are merely feeling embarrassment for a lack of professional accomplishments.

"[They're] self-entitled pricks who think the world owes them a living… But then you get out into the real world and you realize, 'I'm a fucking loser,'" he slams. "They're feeling shame. They've been shamed by life because they haven't been prepared for life. They've had so much smoke blown up their collective asses, by the time they get out in the real world and they realize, the real world doesn't give a fuck where you're from or what your mommy said you were or how pretty you are."

Listen to full interview below. For his part, Carolla is the father of two young children -- five-year-old twins Natalia and Santino.


Thursday, December 1, 2011

@chase Chase exec: we tricked naive borrowers into taking out subprime loans #p2 #tcot @limbaugh @andrewbreitbart

from http://boingboing.net/2011/12/01/chase-exec-we-tricked-naive-b.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+boingboing%2FiBag+%28Boing+Boing%29

An award-winning Chase vice-president has gone public with accusations that his bank deliberately tricked naive borrowers into taking out high-commission loans they could never pay back (his team wrote $2B in loans during the subprime bubble), putting the lie to the narrative that subprime was about greedy borrowers taking money they knew they shouldn't:

One memory particularly troubles Theckston. He says that some account executives earned a commission seven times higher from subprime loans, rather than prime mortgages. So they looked for less savvy borrowers — those with less education, without previous mortgage experience, or without fluent English — and nudged them toward subprime loans.

These less savvy borrowers were disproportionately blacks and Latinos, he said, and they ended up paying a higher rate so that they were more likely to lose their homes. Senior executives seemed aware of this racial mismatch, he recalled, and frantically tried to cover it up.

Theckston, who has a shelf full of awards that he won from Chase, such as "sales manager of the year," showed me his 2006 performance review. It indicates that 60 percent of his evaluation depended on him increasing high-risk loans.

In late 2008, when the mortgage market collapsed, Theckston and most of his colleagues were laid off. He says he bears no animus toward Chase, but he does think it is profoundly unfair that troubled banks have been rescued while troubled homeowners have been evicted.

A Banker Speaks, With Regret (via Naked Capitalism)

Occupied America: Senate bill 1867 would allow U.S. military to detain and murder anti-government protesters in American cities #P2 #TCOT PLEASE R/T

FROM http://www.naturalnews.com/034291_SB_1867_war_on_terror.html

(NaturalNews) I don't know if you're all getting this through your heads yet, but Senate Bill 1867 -- the National Defense Authorization Act -- would openly "legalize" the U.S. government's detainment and murder of OWS protesters and the assassination of talk show hosts, bloggers, journalists and anyone who holds a so-called "anti-government" point of view. This is the open and blatant declaration of war against any who do not going along with TSA thugs reaching down your pants, the Goldman Sachs economic takeover of nations, the secret arrest and torture of American citizens, and other acts of outright tyranny waged by an out-of-control government.

Those who have been burying their heads in the sand over the coming police state need to wake up and face the music. That U.S. Senators would knowingly and willfully attempt to pass a bill that legalizes the indefinite detainment, torture and killing of American citizens with no due process whatsoever -- and on American soil! -- is nothing less than a traitorous betrayal of the once-free American people. These are, our founding fathers would have said, acts of war against the People. They reveal the insidious plan to put in place a legal framework to end the Bill of Rights, murder protesters, and overrun America with total police state brutality.

And yet the sheeple are still asleeple
I grow weary of trying to warn the American people to wake up and see what is now right in front of their eyes, so for those who want to read these words themselves -- right in the Senate bill -- you can read it at: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.1867:

And YES, it has now been confirmed that the indefinite detainment and murder provisions do apply to American citizens on the streets of American cities. As Sen. Lindsey Graham explained in plain language on the Senate floor: "...1031, the statement of authority to detain, does apply to American citizens and it designates the world as the battlefield, including the homeland."

That means America, for those of you who are still wondering what "homeland" means. It's a phrase borrowed from Nazi Germany, of course, which is the source of much of this legislation as you might have noticed.

"The power is so broad that even U.S. citizens could be swept up by the military and the military could be used far from any battlefield, even within the United States itself," says the ACLU (http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/senators-demand-military-lock-american-citizens-battlefield-they-define-being).

Homefront: The U.S. government's war against the People
If this bill passes and is signed into law, it would mean that America's war machine could then be turned against the American people -- liberal, conservative, libertarian... it doesn't matter. If you question the government, you are suddenly an "enemy combatant" and they will cite this law as the legal justification for putting a bullet in your head, fire-bombing your little protest group, or literally running over you and your buddies with tanks. (And they won't stop like China did in Tiananmen Square when that one brave citizen stood up against tyranny there in 1989.) (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6inWKFKv9UA)

The premeditate murder of U.S. protesters (Occupy Wall Street, anyone?) is now being codified into law as the government's "right." Of course, your rights to Free Speech, due process, owning a firearm and other rights are being obliterated in the process. Only the government has "rights" now, didn't you know? The slaves of the nation (i.e. the citizens) are being stripped of all rights, including the right to grow your own food, have a picnic or even buy fresh dairy products from a farmer.

Governments routinely murder far more people than terrorists
Right now, every history teacher in America should be absolutely outraged about all this, as they know what always comes next in the history of nations. Once any government "legalizes" the murder of its own citizens, it is inevitably followed by a mass-murder holocaust-style event.

Tyrants, you see, always like to "legalize" their mass murder before they pull the trigger. Just read the history of Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao and others. In every case, they worked diligently to put into place a legal framework for the mass murder that was about to be unleashes on their own citizens. That legal framework looks strikingly similar to Senate Bill 1867, which is about to be passed.

This also brings to mind the mathematical reality that, statistically speaking, governments are orders of magnitude more deadly than terrorists. While terrorists sometimes success in taking out a few thousandpeople at a time, governments routinely murder tens of MILLIONS of people.

It's called GENOCIDE, and there's a long and well-documented history of how governments have committed genocide year after year, one nation after another: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history

See more statistics at: http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/dictat.html

So if the People of America had any courage at all, they would be running the People's road blocks and searching government vehicles for weapons! It is the government agents, after all, who are statistically at the highest risk of engaging in mass murder, and very soon the U.S. Senate looks likely to effectively legalizethat mass murder.

At the airports, We the People should be searching the TSA employees and checking them for illegal drugs, child pornography and stolen electronics. At government buildings, We the People should be searching all the government employees who come and go to make sure they don't stage the demolition of their own buildings as a way to blame whatever convenient enemy they want to discredit -- patriots, conservatives, "conspiracy theorists" or what have you.

It's no longer a conspiracy theory, you see, that the government wants to have the legal right to openly murder U.S. citizens right on the streets of America. It's written right into the Senate bill. It's public record. So all those out there still clinging to their pathetic denialist "conspiracy theorists" rants can now clamp shut their pie holes and throw themselves off a cliff or something. It's time to face the reality of the total police state tyranny that's now written in black and white, plain as day.

All of you who are still obsessed with your narrow world view of fashion, dancing with the stars, microwaveable processed food and fake mainstream news are about to be rocked out of your easy chairs and dumped into the cesspool of tyranny at your doorstep. Just know that when they come for you, there will be nobody left to speak for you, because you remained silent as all this was rolled out. And I won't be there for you, either, because I'll be holed up in Texas, handing out emergency food supplies to the local churches and performing emergency medicine procedures on those protesters wounded by U.S. government military attacks -- the ones that are still alive, anyway.

You think none of this is coming? Why would the U.S. Senate write this into law if they didn't intend on using it to murder Americans? Maybe you need to clear the cobwebs out of your head and open your eyes to what's really happening right now in the U.S. Senate.

Read between the lines, folks. It's not that difficult to get the full picture here. The very idea that the U.S. Senate is even considering such a law to "legalize" the detainment and murder of U.S. citizens on U.S. soil by U.S. troops is, all by itself, a complete and utter crime against the American people.

The U.S. Senate is about to declare WAR on the American people. And I don't mean that metaphorically. They are trying to make this a military war where anyone who opposes the U.S. government -- even if they have nothing at all to do with "terrorism" -- is now a fair game target for precision bombings, assassinations and heavy military armor (i.e. tanks rolling down your driveway).

Some good news: Congressman Dennis Kucinich has publicly spoken out against the bill (even though he's not in the Senate). So has Sen. Rand Paul. His father, Ron Paul, has also stated his opposition to the illegal detainment provision of the bill. There are hints that if the bill passes, President Obama may veto it. If he did, that would be one of the most profound freedom-protecting actions of his administration, but don't hold your breath on that count. You never know what these politicians will do when they think they have the power to murder their own citizens -- they're drunk with power, after all, and they love to rule over the masses with a kind of devilish insanity. Remember: Obama already has a "kill list" of Americans to be murdered overseas, but this new Senate Bill 1867 would legalize that right on U.S. soil.

So one day you call in to talk radio and express your discontent with the President, let's say, and the next day a U.S. marine scout sniper sets up his .338 sniper rifle a couple hundred yards from your house, waits for you to sit down to watch Anderson Cooper vomit out the evening's news propaganda, and then he pulls the trigger and blows your neck off, causing your head to land smack dab in that bowl of Kraft Macaroni and Cheese you were just trying to shovel down your threat because someone told you it was "food." This will all be LEGAL under the new Senate bill 1867 because they will claim you were a "terrorist collaborator" who questioned the wisdom of the executive leadership of America. Once due process is stripped away, anything can be justified by the government, including the open murder of its own citizens.

This is the whole point of a nation of LAW. The laws describe specific legal rights afforded to citizens, but most importantly they describe the LIMITS of power of government. It is those limits that the government is now trying to completely obliterate, turning America into a complete military dictatorship / fascist nation where laws are only applied to the People, not to the government itself. These are practically the exact words recently uttered by Newt Gingrich during a recent debate, in which he said due process and the Bill of Rights should only apply to people who engage in common criminal acts such as stealing or robbing people. But no such rights or due process privileges should exist when there is a "war" going on, Gingrich insisted! And the U.S. Senate is about to declare the entire USA "homeland" to be a battlefield of a never-ending war, get it?

Are you grokking all this yet? These tyrants are about to declare the entire USA a battlefield where NO ONE has any due process, no Bill of Rights, no protections under any law, nothing! And if Gingrich becomes President -- oh my God please don't let this happen -- then we are looking at the runaway militarization of everything in America, including a huge ramping up of the so-called "war on drugs" which we've already exposed as a total failure and a complete hoax (http://www.naturalnews.com/034289_Afghanistan_opium_trade.html).

If this bill passes and is signed into law by the President, the USA is officially at war with its own People, and you can expect the government will immediately begin staging false flag bombings so they can justify a multi-year campaign of total genocide against all who refuse to cower down to the (now admitted) anti-freedom tyrants in Washington.

We are on the verge of losing America, my friends. I ask: What the hell are YOU going to do about it?

Here's the list of traitors in the U.S. Senate who have supported this bill: http://www.truthistreason.net/sb-1867-worldwide-indefinite-detention-and-the-senators-who-betrayed-you

Read more: http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/196207-senate-votes-to-advance-department-of-defense-authorization-bill

http://www.infowars.com/bill-allows-military-to-arrest-permanently-detain-torture-kill-american-citizens/

http://dancingczars.wordpress.com/tag/kill-s-b-1867/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2813837/posts

Rochester Fends Off Home Foreclosure As Occupy Our Homes Sharpens Aim At Foreclosure Crisis #p2 #tcot @andrewbreitbart

from http://thinkprogress.org/special/2011/12/01/378199/rochester-fends-off-home-foreclosure-as-occupy-our-homes-sharpens-aim-at-foreclosure-crisis/

Harold Steidel at a Rochester Wells Fargo Protest

One new initiative from the 99 Percent Movement is Occupy Our Homes, which aims to help victims of the foreclosure crisis. Although this effort has not been formerly named until now, communities have already seenremarkable success by planning to occupy homes threatened with foreclosure.

The Occupy protests got yet another victory last week in Rochester, New York. The Steidels contacted Take Back the Land and Occupy Rochester in September, and were soon joined by over 100 people who protested at Wells Fargo and foreclosure firm Steven J. Baum's offices. If necessary, the groups threatened to encamp on the property; however, the mortgage giant Freddie Mac recently backed down, likely due to support from the public and Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY).

This focus on helping shielding families from foreclosures helps answer the question of how the demonstrators will regroup for the winter. From Salon:

"This is a shift from protesting Wall Street fraud to taking action on behalf of people who were harmed by it. It brings the movement into the neighborhoods and gives people a sense of what's really at stake," said Max Berger, one of the Occupy Our Homes organizers and a member of Occupy Wall Street's movement-building working group. The backdrop for all this is a new study suggesting the foreclosure crisis is only half over, with 4 million homes in some stage of foreclosure.

In a city like Rochester, there is ample opportunity to take action on behalf of those in need. Rochester has one of the highest children's poverty rates at 43 percent as well as a poor city school system where only 5 percent of high school graduates meet minimum standards for college, compared to 72 percent in wealthier districts.

Apple Responds To Siri Controversy, Insists Misleading Abortion Answers Not Intentional

from http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2011/12/01/379625/apple-responds-to-siri-controversy-insists-misleading-abortion-answers-not-intentional/

Apple has finally responded to the controversy surrounding Siri, the voice-activated assistant of the iPhone 4s, and its misleading answers to pressing women's health questions. According to the New York Times, the company said the inability of the program to provide information about abortion clinics was not intentional or deliberate, and "attributed the problem to kinks in the product that were still being ironed out." But Apple did not address some of the most disturbing complaints that Siri guided women seeking abortions to anti-choice "crisis pregnancy centers," and routinely offered no information about rape centers or emergency contraception. Nor did they offer an explanation for the discrepancy between this lack of information and the readiness with which the program helped people seeking escort services, Viagra, or guns.

New Hampshire GOP Speaker Discourages Students From Voting Because They’ll Vote ‘Liberal’ #p2 #tcot @andrewbreitbart

from http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2011/12/01/379434/new-hampshire-gop-speaker-discourages-students-from-voting-because-theyll-vote-liberal/

New Hampshire Speaker William O'Brien (R)

As ThinkProgress has been reporting, the slew of unnecessary voter ID laws passed by Republicans in many states this year are a transparent attempt to disenfranchise core Democratic voters, especially college students, the poor and minorities. But Republicans usually claim these laws are passed for the sake of curbing nonexistent voter fraud — it's rare to have one admit their intention is to stop Democrats from getting to the polls.

But that's exactly what New Hampshire Speaker William O'Brien (R) told a Tea Party crowd recently. As the new laws are already stifling students' efforts to participate politically, O'Brien confessed that he wanted to make it more difficult for students to vote because they "vote their feelings" — i.e. vote as liberals:

A New Hampshire measure that ultimately failed earlier this year stoked Democratic concerns about the law's true intentions. The law would have ended same-day registration and prohibited most college students from voting from their school addresses.

New Hampshire House Speaker William O'Brien, a Republican, told a tea party group thatallowing people to register and vote on Election Day led to "the kids coming out of the schools and basically doing what I did when I was a kid, which is voting as a liberal. That's what kids do — they don't have life experience, and they just vote their feelings."

New Hampshire's voter ID bill failed to pass, but illegal signs nevertheless appeared on the door of a polling station in O'Brien's own district, demanding that voters show ID before they could vote.

Under many state's voter ID laws, student IDs and even government-issued veterans identification cards areunacceptable for use at polling stations.

Police State to be Created by Congress This Week #p2 #tcot Senate Bill 1867 homeland is part of the battlefield and people can be imprisoned without charge or trial

from http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2011/11/412654.shtml


In response to the Occupy Movement and its perceived threat to the status quo, Congress will vote next week on Senate Bill 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, to explicitly create a police state. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) explained that the bill will "basically say in law for the first time that the homeland is part of the battlefield" and people can be imprisoned without charge or trial "American citizen or not." Another supporter, Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), also declared that the bill is needed because "America is part of the battlefield." Write your Senator NOW! 

Now is the time to stop this bad idea. Please urge your senators to vote YES on the Udall Amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act which would remove the harmful provisions from the bill and in their place, mandate a process for Congress to use an orderly process to consider whether any detention legislation is needed. 

Write to your Senators now at: 
 https://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=3865&s_subsrc=fixNDAA 

 link to www.blacklistednews.com 

[Related:  http://www.democracynow.org/2011/11/29/battlefield_america_us_citizens_face_indefinite]